User talk:El Roih

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 12:27, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Large Apparatus studying Grand Unification and Neutrino Astrophysics


The article Large Apparatus studying Grand Unification and Neutrino Astrophysics has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for science projects

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 17:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2V (V-69)


The article 2V (V-69) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not sufficient standalone notability, may be better as a category or brief (sourced) note on each of these pages

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Plerogram listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Plerogram. Since you had some involvement with the Plerogram redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ Talk Email 16:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Foreign-language redirects
When you create redirects from foreign languages, could you please use (for example) ? An example is. Gorobay (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Policy on bold-facing
Hello El Roih. Please do not bold-face foreign names in article lead sections. Please read Manual of Style/Lead section: "Do not boldface foreign names not normally used in English, or variations included only to show etymology". Cheers. --Omnipaedista (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

You need to start communicating
All your boldfacing edits have been reverted since they were in violation of Wikipedia's manual of style. Many of your edits in which you have entered English text (either by username or by IP address (128.214.72.156)) were also reverted since the grammatical errors in those texts were unacceptable—the text was literally incomprehensible. I noticed that you never provide an edit summary or discuss your edits. I see a couple of attempts by editors to communicate with you, none of which you have replied to. As we are a collaborative project, you need to start communicating and explaining your edits, either on talk pages or in edit summaries. If you continue to restore your MOS-violating edits as you did here and if you can't show that you are communicating with other editors, I will have to consider to report you to an administrator. --Omnipaedista (talk) 09:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

User:El Roih listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect User:El Roih. Since you had some involvement with the User:El Roih redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). John Vandenberg (chat) 09:25, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Next Gravitational wave Observatory listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Next Gravitational wave Observatory. Since you had some involvement with the Next Gravitational wave Observatory redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Пафну́тий Льво́вич Чебышёв" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Пафну́тий Льво́вич Чебышёв. Since you had some involvement with the Пафну́тий Льво́вич Чебышёв redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Starlink
You don't have a reference, where did you get this information? Cordially. CRS-20 (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Breakthrough Filmmakers Challenge moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Breakthrough Filmmakers Challenge, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  22:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Frederick Reines
Hi. Your edit to Frederick Reines was reverted for two reasons:

First, as I'm sure you must know by now, since you've accumulated over 4,500 edits here since 2010, Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation.

Second, hypocorisms should not be added to the opening sentence of the Lead, as explained at WP:HYPOCORISM.

Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

2021 in Spaceflight
I saw that you removed suborbital statistics from the table. If there are any launches that have occurred that aren't on the list. Please add them. I've really tried to step up and focus on the suborbital section for this year and I think that I've cataloged all of them. But if not, please feel free to assist. And if its only going to be orbital launches, it should be moved to the orbital launch statistics section. --Jrcraft Yt (talk) 20:08, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello.Nice to hear that someone is looking more thoroughly into the suborbital launches, that really is needed. However I still think it would be best not to include them in the statistics or at least separate the statistics of orbital and suborbital launches. Three main reasons for this come to mind: 1. In previous years (and in other spaceflight-related websites than wikipedia) only the orbital launches are counted, so if suborbital launches are included in the statistics for "2021 in spaceflight"-wikipedia article then these statistics are no longer compatible with statistics of previous years in wikipedia (or on other internet-webpages). 2.Whereas there are good sources (in the internet and in the news) listing orbital launches, there are (according to my knowledge) not sources of similar quality giving information about suborbital launches, thus making the verification of what suborbital launches have taken place etc. a big problem. Especially as quite many suborbital launches are military launches, the information about them might not be available to public. Thus it is very hard to be sure your list of suborbital launches is complete or even representative of the true situation.This is not the case with orbital launches where, because you have good sources, you can be confident that your list and thus your statistics are true and complete.3.What is the definition of suborbital launch? How high must a rocket fly to be considered a suborbital launch? Is a high-altitude anti-aircraft missile a suborbital launch? One should be careful on how to define the suborbital launch, otherwise there are somany sources of suborbital launches that listing them becomes impossible. Also there are other sources than rockets that must be considered if one for example would define that a suborbital launch is one where the rocket flies 30km altitude;this altitude can be reached by a jet-fighter aircraft making a parabolic jump and balloons regularly visit this altitude.

For these reasons i think it is better to either only include orbital launches in the statistics or make separate statistics for orbital and suborbital launches.

P.S. I have no information about any suborbital launches and thus cannot be of any assistance in that matter, sorry. BTW, where do you get your suborbital-information? I would be interested to take a look.

P.P.S. Sorry about the quality I am not on a computer; I write this on a mobile device and if is awful. El Roih (talk) 13:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

For normal public launches, its easy. For some of the military ones that don't disclose much, it can take days to verify everything. Thats why they sometimes get added a couple days late. Ballistic missiles are the trickiest. Especially when they come from countries who are less than open. But all of the details come out, just a couple of days after the fact. I only include launches that go (or are intended) above 80km which is the U.S. line so that their aren't any disparities. I started doing the suborbital stuff because there were many launches last year that were not added. So I figured that that section needed some help. There have been more suborbital launches this year already than all of last year. And more than the number of orbital launches.--Jrcraft Yt (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Breakthrough Filmmakers Challenge
Hello, El Roih. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Breakthrough Filmmakers Challenge, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Discussion has started on List of Starship Flights
A discussion has started on List of Starship Flights. It is about adding SN15 and BN2 to the table. Link: Talk:List_of_Starship_flights 64.121.103.144 (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

New Dispute Resolution Request!
There is now a dispute resolution request about whether we should add SN15 and BN2 to List of Starship flights. Please add your comments. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

New Draft
You are requested to edit Draft: Starship SN11. It has been declined a few times after I created it, so I need help from another editor. Please add more references and information. This message has been sent to you because you have already edited other SpaceX Starship articles. 64.121.103.144 (talk) 23:57, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Glenn Research Center, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 18:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

West Coast Customs
I typed your username wrong but wanted to make sure you saw this edit summary. If indeed Friedlinghaus founded the company in 1993, then he was operating it illegally, in an unlicensed capacity, for seven years. It's just not true, it's the same deal as the mythical $5,000. It's a just-so story for the press. Given how many times Friedlinghaus has himself vandalized Wikipedia, and paid others to do so, his statements should be given even more scrutiny than the typical WP:SPS. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 21:41, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

If you have better information, I am fine accepting it. If I remember correctly, my source was either the company website or some press article; if these are mistaken or cannot be trusted, then I am willing to admit I really do not possess any more information about the situation. El Roih (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

I checked; the source was the company website. As I said, I am fine with anything concerning that article since I do not really have any better information. The only argument to include the date from the company website is to highlight the fact that everybody has their own date for the founding of the company (even the newspapers have multiple dates). These kind of situations are always tricky as even the entertainment-journalism in otherwise well-reputed papers is not always that reliable (to be polite) so it is sometimes hard to find out what the actual truth is. And I honestly do not have interest to look into this further. But thanks for writing me El Roih (talk) 21:49, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * As I said, self-published sources (WP:SPS) like company websites do not trump reliable sources (WP:RS). When they conflict, reliable sources are to be preferred in all cases. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 22:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Army Reserve (Ireland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abkhazian Armed Forces, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armored car.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Copy & paste contents from Oryx website
Hello, you may have noticed that I have reverted your recent edits to List of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War. I would like to remind you that while facts and information cannot be copyrighted, the way to express ideas can be. We cannot copy and paste contents (including headings and text) directly from Oryx website, as you have done in multiple instances You can see that Oryx's website has "Copyright © 2023 Oryx" at the bottom of each page. By copying & pasting directly onto Wikipedia, what you did is making copyright violations and interferes with Wikipedia's ability to further distribute the work through an open license. Your account may be subject to blocks of escalating duration (including indefinite blocks) if this behaviour continues. It also takes a long time for other volunteers to manually untangle the copyright violation text (something which we still haven't finished since May when another editor also copied & pasted Oryx's contents word-for-word). As a general practice, while you can use Oryx website as a reference for what contents to update, it is best to write the content in your own words. The categories names (e.g. "Armoured personnel carriers", "fighter jets", "Surface-to-air missiles") are pretty stable and shouldn't be changed without good reason because they have stayed that way for months and deemed acceptable by most editors on that page. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:49, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Repairing country sections in List of military aid to Ukraine during the Russo-Ukrainian War
Good work on re-linking references back to the statement to repair the damage of an overt copyvio vandal. If you have time, can you help fix the countries on that list? The vandal replaced many independent news sources with Oryx, then moved the references to the bottom of that country's section and scrambled them so nobody knows which aid came from which source. OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:04, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Air Forces inventory table update
Thank you for updating the inventory table on Air Forces articles. However, according to WP:AIRCRAFT-OPERATORS, we should only list confirmed orders with signed purchase contracts, excluding potential orders. Please note that World Air Forces 2024 includes potential orders, denoted by an asterisk next to the figure in the ordered column. This information can be found on page 11 of World Air Forces 2024, which states Our directory – the initial data for which was drawn on 19 October – also includes information about firm orders for some 3,903 aircraft, and letters of intent or options for up to another 7,701 (denoted by an asterisk next to a figure in the Ordered column). Please refrain from including quantities with an asterisk mark in your future edits. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 02:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC)