User talk:El blackfish

March 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 'deremi atanda— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Deremi Atanda
Hi, I wanted to understand your edits around Deremi Atanda and 'Deremi Atanda. I suppose the same person, but we should only keep one article with the correct name. If there should be an apostrophe (') leading the name, I can help you make some edits, but other pages should then be deleted. Jake Brockman (talk) 17:02, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Deremi Atanda, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Responding to your email
If you want to remove the tag, please do so. --Asketbouncer (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Notability
Thanks for your mail. I added the notability tag because the article is mostly sourced to press statements routine coverage and unreliable sources. The possibly good source was this Guardian piece. I did not nominate it for deletion because I'm yet to do a BEFORE search. Kind regards,  Princess of Ara  14:09, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Okay thanks, the other pieces are also good eg Vanguard, Leadership, BusinessDay and Thisday are four of the most notable mainstream platforms in the country.

Regarding your claim of the coverage being mostly press statements, I can’t argue with that. However if they weren’t newsworthy enough then they wouldn’t have received coverage.

By and large, thank you for the response. I appreciate every constructive feedback in this Wikipedia journey of mine. El blackfish (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * A press statement is not the kind of coverage that can be used to make a notability claim. A press statement was intentionally sent out by the company themselves it is therefore a primary source as it is not independent of the subject. Being published in mainstream news platforms doesn't change the fact that they are well orchestrated PR placements and does not make them reliable.  Princess of Ara  19:06, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Zenera Consulting moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Zenera Consulting, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 11:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Stop
You are not permitted to modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block, such as you did here. You are welcome to make a new unblock request, but you'll need to be specific and exact about the nature of your relationship to the people and organisations you have written about. Specific and exact. --Yamla (talk) 12:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Alliance for Science (Organisation)
A tag has been placed on Draft:Alliance for Science (Organisation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hayleez  (talk)  20:36, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Damilola Michael Aderibigbe moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Damilola Michael Aderibigbe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aloolkaparatha (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Zenera Consulting
Hello, El blackfish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zenera Consulting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Zenera Consulting


Hello, El blackfish. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zenera Consulting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! RoanokeVirginia (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Damilola Michael Aderibigbe
Hello, El blackfish. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Damilola Michael Aderibigbe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC)