User talk:Eladkse/Archive 1

Proposed deletion of Holy Musical B@man!


The article Holy Musical B@man! has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indications of notability, no coverage from independent sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:06, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Musical B@man! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Musical B@man! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Musical B@man! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Aaron Booth (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

File:StarKidUserbox.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:StarKidUserbox.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. When you recently edited The SPACE Tour, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Keyboard and Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Re: The SPACE Tour
Hi, I saw your question on the help desk. I'm a little concerned that your use of the reference you asked about there might be a case of WP:SYNTH—two references, 1) that they state this is the last date and 2) a tour calendar, are used to infer a conclusion about where the show was recorded. It might seem picky, but it is possible that various tracks on the album were recorded at different concerts and edited together for the album. With this in mind, instead of writing "it was recorded at the tour's last concert…" it might be better to write something along the lines of "it is not stated which concert (or concerts) features on the album, but on the track Even Though the performers can be heard stating that it is the last show of the tour, which took place at the Gramercy Theatre, New York."—Jeremy (talk) 21:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I thank you for your concern. I am confident through minor referenes on other tracks (the occastional "Hello New York!" and what not) and comments by the group on social networking sites that it was a single recording. What I will do tommorrow is contact the team on Twitter and see what they say, and if that fails, add more track refs. I feel trying to cover all bases in this case would just make the article too confusing. Eladkse (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Space Tour
Hi Eladkse,

Thanks for the heads up! Good job on the articles! :-) --Mimi C. (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Requested comments
As for weak points, the article needs the reception template with the most grades possible up to 10, perhaps a music sample, if possible a more elaborated personnel section, as of now it only has perforing personnel, not producing and technical personnel; and more importantly to be a B, it needs more than one prose sections, the two more moccomon are background which already has and a repection section, where information and the template are located. I`m sorry to sound a**hole-ish and picky but in my experience this things not only will get you the B but will put the article in good track for a GA. I would love to rate it a B but i`m afraid a can`t just jet. Sorry. Zidane tribal (talk) 18:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 19:40, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

That's What I Call StarKid!
Hi Eladkse. I noticed that you undid my revision (I put in that it was also released on iTunes on the same day, accompanied with appropriate reference) and your explanation was "double reference". I put in the reference to support the iTunes release since the other reference made no mention of it. Wikipedia, as far as I know, does not have a rule against double references, or more, for that matter (Wikipedia:Citing sources). Could you please clarify your revision so I can have a better understanding? Thank you! --Mimi C. (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, my bad. I misread it as a duplicate Bandcamp reference. However, the iTunes version was released a few days later. Eladkse (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

No problem :) Quick correction - on iTunes, it says that the release date was April 13, 2012. FYI, I moved the article to include the full name (Volume 2) --Mimi C. (talk) 20:07, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of That's What I Call StarKid! Volume 2 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article That's What I Call StarKid! Volume 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/That's What I Call StarKid! Volume 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:56, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Musical B@man! (soundtrack) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Musical B@man! (soundtrack) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Musical B@man! (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  01:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

StarKid Productions
I can't believe that they are considering deleting the StarKid Productions article and your linked articles! They are certainly notable.--Mimi C. (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi again! Just wanted to inform you that they are still considering to delete your articles for the soundtracks for Holy Musical B@man and That's What I Call StarKid. You might want to drop a note to Keep the articles, if you're concerned. --Mimi C. (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2012 (UTC)