User talk:Elahrairah/Archive 2

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello
Hello how are? .. i would like to add this Paragraph in the article of christianity and it's with "Identifying reliable sources" as the britannica enyclopedia ... the prolbelm that they delet it can u shcik this paragraph and tell what the problem and thank U :)

Impact Of Christianity On Civilization The role of the Christianity in Western civilization has been intricately intertwined with the history and formation of history and formation of Western society. Through its long history, the church has been a major source of social services like schooling, several universities in the world was founded by the Church, some historians of science J.L. Heilbron, A.C. Crombie, David Lindberg, Edward Grant, Thomas Goldstein, and Ted Davis, have argued that that Church had a significant, positive influence on the development of science, and the Church's priest-scientists, many of whom were Jesuits, have been among the leading lights in astronomy, genetics, geomagnetism, meteorology, seismology, and solar physics, becoming some of the "fathers" of these sciences,. Church encourage medical care and welfare services and had influnce in economic; inspiration for culture and philosophy; and influential player in politics and religion. And engineering and mathematics was highly advanced and its reflected through the evolution of architecture in the Middle Ages. In various ways it has sought to affect Western attitudes to vice and virtue in diverse fields. It has, over many centuries, promulgated the teachings of Jesus within the Western World and remains a source of continuity linking modern Western culture to classical Western culture. The Bible and Christian theology have also strongly influenced Western philosophers and political activists. The teachings of Jesus, such as the Parable of the Good Samaritan, are among the important sources for modern notions of Human Rights and the welfare measures commonly provided by governments in the West. Long held Christian teachings on sexuality and marriage have also been influential in family life. Christianity played a role in ending practices such as human sacrifice, slavery, infanticide and polygamy. Christianity in general affected the status of women by condemning infanticide (female infants were more likely to be killed), divorce, incest, polygamy, birth control, abortion and marital infidelity. While official Church teaching considers women and men to be complementary Influence of Christianity does not stop the on Western civilization, Christians also have played a prominent role in the development and pioneering features of the Islamic civilization. The cultural influence of the Church has been vast. festivals like Easter and Christmas are marked universally as public holidays; Pope Gregory XIII's Gregorian Calendar has been adopted internationally as the civil calendar; and time itself is measured by the West from the assumed date of the birth of the Church's founder, Jesus of Nazareth: the Year One AD (Anno Domini). In the list of the 100 Most Influential People in Human history, Percent 65 Christian figures from various fields.

From: Jobas (talk) 20:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi there. There are a few things I need to point out. Firstly, if you look at the edit summaries in the revision history for Christianity, you'll see that your edit was reverted because another editor had serious concerns about the content that you added. I would recommend that you do not add this content again without discussing it on the talk page of the article. In fact, I would encourage you not to add this content at all, as it falls foul of several wikipedia policies. Before continuing your editing, I advise you to read WP:SYNTHESIS, WP:OR and WP:POV.


 * Secondly, I note that after an admin responded to a CSD notice on Impact Of Christianity On Civilization by removing the contents and redirecting the page to the Christianity article (which was entirely the correct decision), you subverted this by restoring the article to its original content. I have now restored the admin's version (the redirect). Do not re-add the content there. Doing so may be seen as disruptive.


 * I hope this helps, but in short I won't be adding it for you. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 20:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * thank you for responding ... i know the policy of the source that why i write Identifying reliable sources i don't really understand why you deleted my artical i think it's another issue and the artical of christianity don't talk about it and the artical was with sources.Jobas (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete anything; I'm not an administrator. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 00:37, 26 January 2012 (UTC)  Sorry, actually I did remove that content. If you're unsure why, read my response above.  Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 00:39, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

DRV
A notification that the Templates for Discussion discussion (oy, repetition) has been taken to a deletion review discussion. The Article Rescue Squadron was notified, and as notifications to previous involved parties isn't normal practise, I and a few ARS members agreed that, in the interests of transparency and fairness, we should let everyone know...hence this talkpage message ;).

If anyone has an issue with me sending these out, do drop me a note on my talkpage. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 10:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

CHUU
Per CHUU, are you Joel on etwiki?  MBisanz  talk 22:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

afd recreation
An AFD article you participated in has been recreated. You may wish to comment Articles_for_deletion/Pascal_Andres_(2nd_nomination) Gaijin42 (talk) 14:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

IPBE
Editing from blocked IP. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 10:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

proper AFD
On this deletion discussion the penultimate comment reads " Perhaps this AfD should be run a third time, this time semi-protected. It seems we can't get a proper AfD on this article without widespread on- and off-wiki canvassing. —SW— 18:27, 20 December 2011 (UTC)" which is what I'm soliciting. (and I think the recent spamming of Occupy Police in the final paragraph of Occupy Marines proves that activists have misconceptions about Wikipedia--pasted below) So, if you know how to initiate an AFD with semi-protection, then shall we let it have a 3rd & final run?

This ramblitive run-on sentence shows not only their spammative nature, but also their complexity of encyclopedic thought. They are better off sticking to twitter and not Wikipedia ;-) 완젬스 (talk) 23:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I understand your concerns. Unfortunately I haven't been able to get involved in recent developments because I'm overseas, and all the internet cafes here are blocked as open proxies, so I'm kinda hamstrung. Besides, I'm not an admin so I couldn't do anything about semi-protecting an AfD. I don't know if it's ever been done before or if there's any policy/guideline/precedent regarding semi-protected AfDs, but I would suggest raising the issue at the administrator's noticeboard and see what they have to say there. Hope this helps. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 06:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)


 * P.S. - As the block on your IP currently expires in less than two months, I've made a note to recheck your situation on March 25th, and remove your IPBE at that time if it no longer seems to be necessary. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 01:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)\


 * I'm very grateful for your help; I will also try to remember to contact you as soon as I no longer need the flag. I'm still a bit confused as to whether this allows me to edit from the blocked internet cafes (as the edit notice that appears when I try to edit from them states they're blocked as open proxies), but since this is why I applied for the flag in the first place I will edit from them. If this is unacceptable to you (or indeed any other admin reading this), please let me know and/or remove the flag and explain. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 06:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Discussion notification
FYI - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Regards, MarkMysoe (talk 23:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 07:34, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:02, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

My List
I have created a list and i have included ur name in it. I hope u dont mind that. You can view it over Here!  Yash t  101  :)  04:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

IPBE removed
Hello Basalisk, just so you know, I'm removing the IP Block Exemption I gave you some time ago, as it looks like the blocks that were affecting you previously have since expired. You should not have any difficulty editing, but if you do, please send me an email or post an unblock request here and I or another checkuser will look into it. Happy editing! Hers fold  (t/a/c) 03:17, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I'm back in the UK now editing from my home IP address, so there shouldn't be a problem. Thanks for helping me out. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 07:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Happy Easter!
Happy Easter! Hope your day is great!  Yash  t  101   11:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Unagressive not a word?
I checked several places. Why do you assume that "unaggressive"is not a word? See, e.g., http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/unaggressive P0M (talk) 01:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Basically, I'd never heard it before and I just used my browser spell checker to make a final decision (it flagged it up). I didn't think it a controversial change, but if you really want just change it back. That said, if you really want to use a single adjective then perhaps "docile" or "passive" is better; I still think "unagressive" sounds a bit odd. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 11:55, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * (Unindent to avoid cutting across the above question.) The spiders described as "unagressive" are anything but docile. They will not be pushed around. Neither are they passive. They react to what they perceive as aggression on the part of others by fighting back. I believe the intent of the article was to allay the fears of people who might imagine that these spiders would "come after them" for no good reason.


 * Cows are unaggressive. Most of the time they are also docile and passive. But that does not mean that they won't become very dangerous to human beings if they are guarding a new calf. A neighbor had a cow that was attacked by a dog that somebody had permitted to run free. The dog grabbed the cow by the nose and would not let go. The cow dragged the dog into a pond and finished it off there. I would not call that cow aggressive.


 * I suppose there may be a legitimate question whenever an animal defends itself. Some tarantulas, e.g., members of the genus Avicularia, are docile to the point that I have to wonder how they survive in the wild. But people who keep them as pets sometimes manage to get bitten somehow. Other animals are more proactive and will make a big threat display, or even move forward to defend a territory. Except for situations of male competitions for sexual access to females, it is hard to think of situations in which animals "go after" something if they aren't trying to secure something to eat. "Aggression" involves stepping in to go on the attack, I think. Defense is when somebody breaks down my door and I hit him. Aggression is when I go across the street and hit somebody just because I feel like it. P0M (talk) 21:50, 9 April 2012 (UTC)


 * P.S. I don't think very many people would regard the Australian funnel web spiders as "peaceable" either. They want to be left alone, and they will insist on it by going to war.P0M (talk) 21:53, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Whatever. Like I said, I didn't think it was that controversial. If you feel so strongly about it then change it back, no worries. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 02:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

SPI
Thanks for including this character too - User:RUCloseYet? - there is no other way that he could possibly have known about the image that he used; I commented there btw...Modernist (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. When you recently edited William Tobias Ringletaube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batavia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

van Gogh
Hi Basalisk - I hope you didn't get the wrong impression. I feel that the polarization of many disputes on Wikipedia is often a cause of strife (agh!), I like to try to give an outsider's perspective sometimes. As I've said, I think the use of that image is highly communicative. Best, —MistyMorn (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * No of course not, I appreciated your reasonable input. Just thought I'd try and explain my position a little more, as I felt the point I was trying to make was being chronically missed. Thanks for calming things down a bit. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 19:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * That was my intention and I've got the page on my watchlist. I thought about this quite a bit and I feel your position is a very reasonable one, as the picture sends a valid message. I do think a more explanatory caption could help silence criticism. Best, —MistyMorn (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Imo, the best thing is for both of us to back off now, as we've said we will do, and leave the question to others. Best, —MistyMorn (talk) 20:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Reply
Dennis Brown  (talk)  21:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your "friend" was just indef blocked for being a sockpuppet.   Dennis Brown   (talk)  01:14, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Interest in helping with this project?
I have been working for some time to improve 80 key articles on Wikipedia and translate them into as many other languages as possible per Wondering if you would be interested in helping. -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:19, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. I don't think I'd be much use on the translations, but I'd like to help out with improving general quality. I can also help out with copy editing. It's 02:47 here and I'm going to sleep, but I'll take a more in-depth look tomorrow. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 01:49, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Wonderful. Welcome aboard. -- Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Karysun / Year of No Light
Hi. I've declined your speedy on the ground that half of the EP doesn't fit A9 - one band has an article. (I couldn't decide where to draw the line to delete half the article.) I would doubt that this is notable or even significant, but the best course is prod IMO. Peridon (talk) 12:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Heartbreak
Taken directly from the criteria: a separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; permanent stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. This isn't a permemant stub, I mean I only just created the article and you haven't even given a chance for me to expand it. If there is enough coverage then the song would satisfy GNG and be eligible for inclusion. Thanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I've expanded the article and definitely think that it is now eligible for inclusion, since so much has been written about it in reliabls sources. Thanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 03:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello Basalisk, please see Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 15:02, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Prozac poop-out
I see you removed this from requests for article creation, medical. I seem to have quite a few search engine hits for it. If there is a proper medical term for it, can such a page be created as a re-direct to the correct article or section? I was just on that medical creation page to enter another possible article for creation.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * My personal suggestion would be to perhaps begin a "Tolerance" section at the Antidepressant article. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 01:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I know little of medicine. Is it worthy under that name as a re-direct to Antidepressant?--Canoe1967 (talk) 02:11, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, as it's not really an effect at all, is it? I think it could be worthy of a sub-section under the "Therapeutic efficacy" section. Don't just redirect it to the article as-is, because at present the Antidepressant article contains no information about this "poop-out" phenomenon. Sorry for the edit summary when I removed it btw, I didn't look into it and just thought it was some idiot kid adding a stupid entry to the list. I should've done my research, so I apologise. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 10:02, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

No problem at all. I thought I would google it after I saw what looked like an obvious childish edit as well. It does appear to be a common term, just not using medical jargon is all. As I said earlier, I know little of the subject, so I will leave alone for now. If you want to see a true childish edit, look at the April 3, 2012 version of the Got Milk? article.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: Falklands Article
On Talk:Falkland_Islands, you removed my concern about User:Dave1185, stating "removing completely off-topic rant. this has nothing to do with the article; an article talk page is not the place for writing essays on how you've been "wronged" by others. take this elsewhere."

Take it where? The editor is clearly racist against Latinos, and he is dictating what goes into an article of Latino interest. I have a genuine concern about that. If I should take it somewhere else, please tell me where. --Lacarids (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Firstly, he is not "clearly racist against Latinos", and nothing you posted supported that claim (bizarrely, the link you posted was actually to the diff where I removed your subsequent discussion). Secondly, he is not "dictating" anything: there were several editors who thought your posts fell fould of WP:NOTFORUM.
 * As for where to take it, I'm not really convinced it needs to be taken anywhere as Dave hasn't done anything wrong. Look, I can understand that you're frustrated that whatever discussion you were trying to initiate came to nothing, but ranting about other editors isn't the way to get anything done. If you feel it's necessary, perhaps try discussing it with him on his talk page? I don't think there's anything "reportable" in what's happened. Is this ok? Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 19:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Halo multiplayer maps


The article List of Halo multiplayer maps has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No assertion of notability. Why are the maps themselves notable, independent of the game's notability (remember, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED)? Even if the multiplayer aspect of the game has been praised, how is listing the names and features of each map different from a WP:GAMEGUIDE?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Axem Titanium (talk) 20:43, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Halo multiplayer maps for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Halo multiplayer maps is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Halo multiplayer maps until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:06, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Mr. Wikipediania Talk 11:44, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lithuanglish
Hello Basalisk. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lithuanglish, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant hoax. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:44, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

bring back Brock Baker!
Why did you make Brock Baker be deleted? What the hell? I work very hard on my pages and you shouldn't delete them. I did give the significance of the page. You probably didn't look hard enough. That really hurts my feelings. From heymister14
 * I'm sorry, I didn't mean any personal slight. I nominated the article for deletion because the subject is unremarkable - making a few videos (however popular) on youtube does not amount to notability. I've had articles deleted in the past myself and so I know what it feels like when your work goes to waste. How about taking a look at WP:Requested articles and creating a few from those suggestions? Make sure your articles conform to the general notability guideline and you shouldn't have too many problems. Hope this helps. If you have further questions, get back to me. Regards Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 21:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for apologizing. Apology accepted. It's just annoying when pages are deleted. Heymister14 (talk) 21:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)heymister14


 * Purely for your information, the author of the article has asked for re-creation of the article, which i deleted, and I have declined.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Anthony, I had noticed. Good to know I'm on the right lines. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 21:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Re: New pages patrol
'It is advisable to patrol new pages from the bottom of the log: pages only stay in the queue for 30 days (720 hours), and there can be a considerable backlog.' Not a requirement per se, but when not done from the bottom, they age their way in unpatrolled, and are then likely to remain for some time. Dru of Id (talk) 21:06, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 22:17, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:00, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vip Patel
Please try not to tag new pages with criteria A1 or A3 moments after creation. New users will often save first to see if an edit "works", and will add information later. Tagging for deletion just seconds after they save the page initially can be seen as biting. It is generally recommended to wait around 10 minutes before tagging with such templates. Cheers, and nice work patrolling.  " Pepper "  @ 22:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry. Stupid of me. I'm off to the back of the queue for a bit. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 22:37, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No problem. I know that I got yelled at a few times when I did that early on, so it's all I can do to pass on the knowledge.  " Pepper "  @ 22:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 08:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Punky Comment
In what way does my website's wikipedia article look like advertisement? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnMHarrisJr (talk • contribs) 01:18, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't quote direct examples as the article has been deleted and, as I'm not an admin, I therefore have no access to it. However, the information in the link(s) I provided you on your talk page should help to clarify. Ultimately, the organisation isn't notable, and so there's no reason for which the article could possibly be here other than promotion. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 01:20, 3 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Umm...How is it advertisement if it's a non-profit organization? —JohnMHarrisJr —Preceding undated comment added 01:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Umm...where in the definition of advertisement does it say that it has to be on the behalf of a for-profit organisation? Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 01:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Lisa Cimorelli
In the AfD for Lisa Cimorelli, I have bundled AfD for new articles about Amy Cimorelli and Katherine Cimorelli. None of the sisters is notable and their own, and personally I don't think the band is notable, but I will do a separate AfD for that. NJ Wine (talk) 02:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, certainly agree with you on counts one and two; possibly on count three also. Let's see what others think. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 02:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I submitted the band Cimorelli for AfD on the grounds that they do not meet WP:MUSIC. The AfD for the band is not as clear-cut as the AfD for the sisters, but I could only find one independent source (Malibu Times) that gives them non-trivial coverage.  I can't prove it, but considering the amount of puffery in Malibu Times article (e.g., compares them to the Jackson 5), I suspect that this is a non-notable band that had a very good friend at a newspaper. NJ Wine (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look. Cheers Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 03:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)