User talk:Elandogold

January 2007
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Will Beback · † · 01:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as Potatos and a small muffin chicken pie) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. FreplySpang 20:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Mrath 04:00, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Sandbox
I WANT A SANDBOX!!!!!!!!!! SANDBOX'S ARE JUST SO AMAZINGLY AWESOME!! THEY'RE THE BEST IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD!!!!!!!!!- Megonzonzon (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

WTF!!!! WHAT IS THE SANDBOX??????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elandogold (talk • contribs) 03:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

WTF!!!! THE SANDBOX IS A TEST SITE FOR THOSE WHO LIKE TO MAKE WEIRD RANDOM SITES U MUFFIN!!!! Legolasluvr 19:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

HAHAHAHA! I LIKE PUFFINS! Legolasluvr 20:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
i think that march of the year 2007 was one of the best years. it was really cool and it was the month before i went to japan!!! man this thing is so cool! i think that i found my new love of the month and the month just started!!! whoooot whooot!!! it's so cool! man, i wish that i would've known about this eariler, because this is just so freaking awaesome!!!!!!!!! Megonzonzon (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Wowissocool may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Dancter 15:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

MWAHAHAHA! I DELETED EVERYTHING! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elandogold (talk • contribs) 22:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

DOGGIES
anyway, sign your name here if you like animals and doggies!!! 63.231.23.10 22:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I ♥ DOGGIES TOO! Blu Pickles 02:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Ditto-Elandogold

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dead marios.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dead marios.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:51, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Bush fat kid dancing.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bush fat kid dancing.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:10, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Vandalism cannot and will not be tolerated. The most common types of vandalism include the addition of obscenities or crude humor, page blanking, the insertion of nonsense into articles or otherwise replacing legitimate content with vandalism.

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism; reinserting it despite multiple warnings is. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention may need to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.

Elandogold (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia
Hi, WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)