User talk:Elassint/Archive1

This page contains all old comments from 2007 through 2008

66.230.200.100
A tag has been placed on 66.230.200.100, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 04:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

I just wanted to say hi, its cool how I can talk on Wikipedia. I'm sad though because my teachers at school don't let us use it because the information is possibly false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.240.124.45 (talk) 02:37, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

recent contribution
Hi there, I see you are a fairly new, but eager editor on Wikipedia, who uses this site as a primary source of information. Welcome on board! I noticed a recent contribution on Oct 22nd on Freemasonry, whereby you added false information - one presumes good faith, and there is a lot of misinformation out on the web to ensnare the casual seeker - suggesting a link betwen freemasonry and satanism. Please contribute only what you know to be facts, and for things which you suspect to be facts to be discussed on the discussion page. Happy editing! docboat 01:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Liberapedia
You recently created the article Liberapedia. This article doesn't make clear if, how and why the subject is notable enough for Wikipedia. Please do so, otherwise the article may be deleted. A ecis Brievenbus 23:54, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Liberapedia speedy nom
A tag has been placed on Liberapedia, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Liberapedia. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. A ecis Brievenbus 00:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007 Conservapedia edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Wisdom89 22:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Commandprobtwikipediaping.GIF
Just wondering, why is this necessary (as a screenshot of a text-based program, what does it add to the article that the pasted output does not?) —Random832 15:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It can help sometimes, I personally think it helps, as people studying these things might want to know what it looks like. I just think it makes the article better! -- ~ Ryan  57  ~  ||  Contribs  05:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The anon RGSW/RGSAO vandaliser
Hi!

Thanks for your efforts in reverting the vandalism. It may interest you that said user has now been blocked (probably not for long- they'll be back).

Regards, Dewarw (talk) 00:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I know Elassint hates vandals a lot, he will usually revert unless he's feeling lazy. -- ~   Ryan A. Taylor   ||  ← that was a link to my user page! OMGWTFBBQ  ||  DUMPING GROUND!   06:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

February 2008 Conservapedia edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Always use the talk page, or include your reasoning in the edit summary. Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 23:57, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Conservapedia
Bring it up on the talk page, don't just revert. Tmtoulouse (talk) 17:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Again I ask you to bring it up on the talk page and not simply revert. Warnings come next. Tmtoulouse (talk) 17:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * I'm have no idea why you would put this on my talk page. If its for Liberapedia put it on my talk page there
 * Of course it's not for LP, for HERE! -- ₪R ya n T ay lo r₪ talk 00:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Commandprobtwikipediaping.GIF)
Thanks for uploading Image:Commandprobtwikipediaping.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tagging via Huggle
I see you've put a tag on Melodic death metal. Actually, a recent anon blanked the page in an attempt to revert vandalism from another anon - see the full-length article now.

No worries, happens to me all the time. :) &mdash;La Pianista  (T•C•S) 02:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
...for reverting the vandalism on my talkpage twice :-)  ~Beano~  (talk) (contribs)  03:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Another thanks
...for reverting vandalism on my user page before I even noticed. Chuckiesdad (talk) 03:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

More thanks
Hello, thanks for reverting vandalism on my page! Loves Macs  (talk) 04:58, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for that! Keep it up! -- ♠Dspradau♠  ♠talk♠ ♠contribs♠  00:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:CSD
Regarding your edit here please note that criterion G4 is only for articles deleted by deletion discussions not for proposed deletions or speedy deletions. If an article is speedy deleted it is likely that the original criterion will still apply. Happy editing, Guest9999 (talk) 00:47, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

George Julian Zolnay
Please check the | Talk page first, the revert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Camel72 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Why?
--Machiavelli11 (talk) 03:38, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks
thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Shirulashem (talk) 02:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

!
I didn't know you were on WP. Shouldn't you be fortifying your empire? The Black Rabbit of Inlé (Talk) 21:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Who are you and what are you talking about? --Elassint (talk) 21:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I am the Black Rabbit of Inlé, silly duckling. I am talking about Liberapedia.
 * Catapults are good; get some catapults. The Black Rabbit of Inlé (Talk) 21:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Article collaboration proposal at WikiProject Space Colonization
Hi, I've put together a proposal for an article collaboration of the week at WikiProject Space Colonization. I would appreciate if you could take a look and let me know if you're interested in participating. Wronkiew (talk) 17:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Greetings from other wikis!
Pleased to make your marvelous acquaintance. ;-) --GentlemanGhost (talk) 01:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Hello. Are you MarvelZuvembie? --Elassint (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, that would be me. --GentlemanGhost (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Long-eared jerboa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Long-eared jerboa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

Comment: Rationalwiki is not the original source, this suggests the image was never released under GFDL. 84.56.73.176 (talk) 11:00, 29 December 2008 (UTC)