User talk:Elatestnews

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Elatestnews, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:54, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Elatestnews (talk) 11:07, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

as elatestnews is leading news portal from Kathmandu nepal, its motive is to provide the news from around the world and of course nepali news with ease. I am the author of elatestnews, but I have had no intention to "promote" or "advertise" on wikipedia. My motivation is to provide a fair amount of overview with objective description. If the proposed article does not meet wikipedias standards, I'm more than willing to improve it.

If this article is really considered to be spam, I'm wondering what the difference between this article and the articles on cricnepal and much more other links which I have found on wikipedia with similar content.

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 11:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory? yes
 * Do you understand conflict of interest? yes
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable? yes

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 15:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elatestnews


A tag has been placed on Elatestnews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 22:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

You cannot unblock yourself
I have restored this page so that your unblock request will appear in the list for administrators to consider. Some more questions: do you understand that Wikipedia is not for advertising or self-promotion, and is not for people or organizations to tell the world about themselves? Please read Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. If unblocked, do you agree to edit in accordance with those principles? JohnCD (talk) 10:16, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi JohnCD its very nice of you for the correct information, yes please I donot understand the wikipedia about wikipedia and if unblocked I agree to edit in accordance with the principles of it. Hoping to get unblocked


 * Please answer all of the above questions specifically, avoiding ambiguity in your answer, and please sign your response.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Well I am not sure what to do, are any one of the guys going to unblock me or i will leave like this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.34.19.235 (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)