User talk:Elcdarling

Welcome!
Hello, Elcdarling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to J. Marion Sims does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! XeniaQuark (talk) 03:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Hello, Your policy which prevents the appropriate characterization of historical figures participated in human trafficking, torture and genocide is deeply racist. I'd like to escalate this dispute and have it reconsidered. Thank you. Elcdarling (talk) 03:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I have just reviewed your policy and as it turns out your rejection of my edit violates your own policy of "without editorial bias." The unwillingness to appropriately characterize J. Marion Sims is inherently racist. Please correct this or I'll escalate. Elcdarling (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Sims is criticized in the very first sentence, and throughout the entire introduction. As well, the only reason anyone knows about him was because of the advances he made in gynecology; without that, he'd be a historical nobody -- just another monster torturing slave women. It would be intellectually dishonest to not mention the reason he's still known. DS (talk) 05:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)