User talk:EleanorMc1968

Shenaaz Nanji
Firstly, uploading a screenshot of a business directory web page is not valid referencing for a statement in a Wikipedia article. Your sourcing for any statement in the article must be published media coverage, such as a book, a newspaper or a magazine, which is doing journalism about her in the context of the statement you're providing a reference for, and uploading primary source files is not an appropriate or acceptable substitute for media coverage.

Secondly, even if your claim that she's part owner of a medical clinic is true, you've still failed to provide any reason why it would be Wikipedia's responsibility to care. Again, if she isn't getting covered by the media in that context, then it isn't relevant or notable at all. Bearcat (talk) 14:46, 16 September 2023 (UTC)


 * To your first point - okay. Fair enough, if that's the way of it.
 * To your second point - as the page is a biography of a living person, details surrounding that person ie biographical details, are of interest, definitionally. It seem's to me that, for whatever reason, you object to the publication of such details? Why? Why do you care what is madee known if it is relevant to that person? Her ownership in the only freestanding abortion clinic in Calgary is a relevant biographical detail of Shenaaz Nanji.
 * Your first point may be valid. Your second is not. EleanorMc1968 (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It isn't relevant until media consider it newsworthy enough to create journalistic content that reports it as news. Notability doesn't vest in doing a thing, it vests in the amount of attention that media did or didn't deign to pay to what the person did. Bearcat (talk) 15:20, 16 September 2023 (UTC)