User talk:Eleavor

December 2012
Hello, I'm Kevin12xd. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to FHA insured loan because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kevin12xd (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to FHA insured loan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted all of your edits that include links to NCFHAexpert. "http://ncfhaexpert.com/" is not a reliable source for the information you are adding, please do not use it as a reference. You have repeatedly inserted links to the NCFHAexpert website in the following articles: FHA insured loan, Mortgage Credit Certificate, VA loan, and USDA Rural Development between the dates of October 11, 2012 and December 28, 2012. Please try to contribute to these articles in another way, using reliable sources (WP:RELIABLE). Your efforts as they stand strongly appear to be WP:REFSPAM, but with better sources they could be worthwhile contributions to Wikipedia. '' Wieldthespade (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NC Housing Finance Agency


A tag has been placed on NC Housing Finance Agency, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  21:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Student loan. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GraemeL (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. GraemeL (talk) 21:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GraemeL (talk) 21:18, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


 * We don't like the addition by an editor of links only to one place because it screams out Conflict of Interest - that is the interest in editing is not creating the encyclopaedia but promoting something outside. If you find a competitor pushing their sites, you can let us know. Very often, it's not the company posting - but if an editor has a very biased list of contributions, then... But that's where we are here, isn't it? A link to a page starting off "Our team offers FHA Cash Out Refinances" and continuing in the same vein isn't an unbiased source of information. It's an advert. We want references and links to be unbiased - Wikipedia isn't a collection of links to BloggsCo, FredBurgers, Julian's Ducklings and anything else that can be fitted in wherever possible. In an article about a company, there can be an External Link to that company. Other External Links should be to unbiased sites giving information but not selling anything. You would be welcome to reference other sources that were neutral, reliable and independent. But please remember that Wikipedia isn't a how to guide WP:NOTHOWTO. You can talk neutrally about different forms of mortgage, but not about how to fill in mortgage forms. Peridon (talk) 15:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Eleavor, let me propose a way to see if you understand how best to act here. First off, since we've ignored you for almost a month, let me apologize: we never should have let you dangle for so long.  Secondly, I'm guessing that it will be a while until you notice this (since we've not responded in almost a month, I don't expect you to check back every day), so I'd like you to let me know directly when you've responded.  You can do this by linking my username in a signed post; the easiest way to do this is simply to type  and follow it up with the four tildes for your signature, just as you did in the last unblock request.  Now, as far as the merits of the unblock request: since you can still edit this talk page, I want you to show how you would improve a page.  Find a page that you'd like to edit, and then copy its entire code here, below the "Edit demonstration" line.  Then, edit away until you think that the text in that section is done.  In my opinion, this will show that you've understood our policies and should be unblocked, or it will show that you still don't understand and shouldn't be unblocked.  Finally, please use the "ping|Nyttend" thing when your page is ready to go.  Nyttend (talk) 02:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)