User talk:Eleazar1954

Speedy deletion of Eleazar. Spanish Painter
A tag has been placed on Eleazar. Spanish Painter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate, article already exists

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -Binary TSO ???

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. -Binary TSO ???

February 2009
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. E Wing (talk) 12:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Eleazar (son of Aaron)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eleazar (son of Aaron), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Eleazar. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. E Wing (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Maintenance tags
Please do not remove maintenance tags from articles, as you did at Eleazar (painter) unless you have made some change to the article to address the maintenance issue. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Autobiography
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)   WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability
From your website, it appears that your art has gained some notice in critical circles. However, as the critiques are on your website, this constitutes a primary source and cannot be considered reliable. If you can provide links to the actual publications in which these critiques appeared, it will go a long way toward bolstering the argument for notability. Otherwise, your article is likely to be deleted as failing notability requirements. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review
I have posted a question at Deletion review which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 10:52, 21 February 2009 (UTC)