User talk:Electra1234

Speedy deletion nomination of Amber Doig-Thorne


A tag has been placed on Amber Doig-Thorne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dane2007 (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Question
Hello! Are you connected to Amber Doig-Thorne in any way? HappyValleyEditor (talk) 18:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)


 * No, but I am a big fan of her and Julius's pranks! Do you know her?? electra1234(talk) 23:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Amber_Doig-Thorne, you may be blocked from editing. Dane2007 (talk) 20:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Amber Doig-Thorne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Doig-Thorne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amber Doig-Thorne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dane2007 (talk) 21:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

 * Electra, thank you for removing the copyright violations from Amber Doig-Thorne. Make sure you note that's what you're doing in your edit summaries, so it's clear to all us of that your edits are exempt from WP:3RR. —C.Fred (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Sorry C.Fred, I thought it was clear what I was doing as it was a screenshot from a llinked video on youtube and thus violates copyright. I now know for the future, so thankyou for advising me. Electra1234 (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dane2007 (talk) 23:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)