User talk:Electrified Fooling Machine

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mitch Fatel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mitch Fatel was changed by Electrified Fooling Machine (u) (t) deleting 82161 characters on 2009-10-27T08:09:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:09, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Biorhythms Calculator
Next time you send an expired prod to AFD, you might consider notifying the prodder. I mean this as helpful advice, not sarcasm - I missed the AfD notice popping up on my watchlist and so missed that discussion. People seem to have found everything that I did two months ago, though, so no harm done. Keep up the good work, - 2/0 (cont.) 20:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

August 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Donald Duck (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Proton-enhanced nuclear induction spectroscopy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Hazard-SJ  Talk 22:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Why are you doing that to the page? I am restraining form giving you a warning for violation of the 3R rule. Can you provide a trusted source to that information?  Hazard-SJ  Talk 22:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I don't remember doing this, but this was a mistake while rushing, and I was about to fix it. For this, it seems I didn't see the bottom part, for this, we must have reverted at almost the same time, causing the "double rollback". I agree that some were not good use, and I'll be more careful. Noo need to report me. Thanks for the notification. Again, to the original matter, I still don't understand the edit, as two others have already removed it, and I am the third. If you find it true, you may redo it, but it would be better with a source, as it somehow seems to be vandalism to us. Sorry for the long wait; I wasn't here.  Hazard-SJ  Talk 00:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Jumbleme (digital encryption service)
Hi. In August you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has now been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking it to AfD. The author says that he has new sources to show notability, so you might give him some time to add them. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I updated the page to reflect the new attention the web site has received. Please let me know if there's anything else I should do to establish notability. Evanmayo (talk) 15:29, 18 December 2010

Refund of Robert A Paquin III
At the request of what may be the subject of the article, I've restored Robert A Paquin III as a contested proposed deletion. As you were the nominator, I figured I'd let you know in case you wish to persue deletion at AfD. Cheers, --joe deckertalk to me 18:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ditto for Multimedia_Australia. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)