User talk:Electrolad

In response to your feedback
Please see Your first article, What Wikipedia is not and Notability (web). The welcome message may help, but you can also contact me on my talkpage.

SwisterTwister  talk  03:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Speedy deletion nomination of Sportkin


A tag has been placed on Sportkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. red dog six (talk) 10:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sportkin‎. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 10:46, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sportkin‎, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. red dog six (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sportkin


A tag has been placed on Sportkin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. InShaneee (talk) 12:36, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sportkin
Hello Electrolad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sportkin for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Christopholes (talk) 13:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia, no matter how worthy the project may be. Articles must also make a credible assertion of notability. I've protected the material against re-creation, as it has been aggressively promoted over the past year. Please review WP:SPAM and WP:NOTE for more on promotion and notability.   Acroterion   (talk)   13:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at Randwick, New South Wales with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Sea photo Talk 18:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. InShaneee (talk) 10:50, 24 January 2013 (UTC)