User talk:Electroswing770

Welcome!
Hello, Electroswing770, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Freshly Squeezed Music, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Dissident Aggressor 05:32, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Freshly Squeezed Music


A tag has been placed on Freshly Squeezed Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 05:32, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Freshly Squeezed Music


A tag has been placed on Freshly Squeezed Music, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Dissident Aggressor 05:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Freshly Squeezed Music
Hello Electroswing! I deleted the article because it had previously been deleted in a deletion discussion (Articles for deletion/Freshly Squeezed Music). It was deleted in that discussion because of a lack of reliable sources. To improve it, you just need to show evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources, following the guideline on notability for organizations. Looking at your sandbox draft, here is what I see: So, I suggest that you keep looking for sources. We have a high standard of notability for articles on companies because they are often promotional. Hope that helps! --Cerebellum (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Telegraph - Reliable source, but just a trivial mention
 * Latest 7 - Decent source, and a moderate level of coverage
 * Margin - Not a very good source; this is some kind of a fashion show, not a newspaper
 * - Link didn't work
 * Blogspot - Not reliable
 * IMDB - Not reliable
 * - Doesn't show notability
 * The two youtube sources are not reliable.

Your signature
Your signature needs to include links as explained at WP:SIGLINK. I wonder whether you have broken your signature in trying to customise it; perhaps you you have unintentionally ticked the "Treat the above as wiki markup" box at Special:Preferences? --David Biddulph (talk) 17:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

First Attempt at page
Please use your sandbox for attempts.Xx236 (talk) 10:38, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Freshly Squeezed music for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freshly Squeezed music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Freshly Squeezed music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greek Legend (talk) 09:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Electro swing have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Electroswing770. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Swingrowers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swingrowers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swingrowers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 14:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Swing Republic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swing Republic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swing Republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Toddst1 (talk) 14:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)