User talk:Elekemkeejekekekeleleke

June 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tsardom of Russia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 00:00, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Tsardom of Russia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dylan &#124; &#9993; &#124; ✓ 00:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Big. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Even if you reverted these changes, you shouldn't be doing them on the page in the first place. Aidan9382 (talk) 12:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here Elekemkeejekekekeleleke (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC) {{unblock reviewed|decline=You do not seem to be actually blocked, however after looking at your edits, blocking you does not seem like a bad idea. PhilKnight (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC)|reason=Your reason here Elekemkeejekekekeleleke (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2023 (UTC)}}

June 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:17, 5 June 2023 (UTC) This might be a first for me. Blocking someone for posting an unblock template while not blocked. (Among the other nonsense edits). RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. PhilKnight (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)