User talk:Elelch

A Belated Welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Elelch. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Hello Elelch so you have knowledge of english too, I hope you don´t mind the little edition that I made to the article of the peruvian championship of 1934, It´s totally fair, so I hope it won't start an edition war. Rdvarq (talk) 22:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Elelch, the facts here, and I´m not ignoring them, are: The FPF and ADFP regognize Universitario as 1934 in its published media but there is no official resolution on record to explain that. The article published in the Classic Football section of fifa.com (which is not an official resolution of FIFA or its official point of view, there is a disclaimer to that) only reflect the latter. The fact is that on record exist a number of official bulletins (ns. 161, 164, 168, 169 and 174 of the Lima League and n. 655 of FPF) that 1) Declare Alianza Lima as Champion of First Division, 2) Acknowledging a protest by Universitario declare a tie in the Tournament Of First Teams 3)Again declare Alianza Lima as Champion of First Division and champion of the Tournament of Reserve Teams and declare a no-winner of the tournament of First Teams as the teams didn't play the defining match in the date determined 4)Determined a date to play the match as asked by Alianza Lima, with the acknowledgement of Universitario, indicating clearly that the match to be played is the Tournament of First Teams Defining Match. 5)And finally after the match of July 7, 1935 the Lima League declared Universitario as Champion of the Tournament of First Teams, not Champion of First Division as it did previously with Alianza Lima. Other facts that are not reflected in neither my version of the article or the one that you support, are that indeed there is at least one newspaper (Diario La Crónica)that on the day after the match talks about Universitario as "Champion", but in another section of the same paper, of the same day mentions that Universitario is the Champion of The Tournament of First Teams. There are List of champions of Peruvian First Division on the newspapers that acknowledge Alianza Lima as champion of 1934. I´m questioning the validity of the FPF web page because is outdated and contain obvious mistakes (Universitario as 1972 Champion, doesn't include 1926 and 1927 years with a Tournament played) and I`m also questioning the validity of the ADFP because it only rules professional football since 1966 an here we are discussing an Amateur Tournament played in 1934. And on the issue of the ongoing effort by supporters of Alianza Lima to get the title recognizad by the media, I'm not including in that effort the article published in dechalaca.com which is not a blog but the only web page in Peru that is dedicated to football historical and statistical and issues. That is an article that supports the effort due to the information that it has provided but in no way campaigns for it. Rdvarq (talk) 22:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Elelch, in an effort to be reasonable as you ask me, in future editions i will not put the text "Universitario itself claim to be the champion". But you can't deny the fact that there is a huge controversy in this subject. Controversy that cannot be understood in such a short article. Personally I think that there is no sense in this kind of articles, even superior leagues don't have them in Wikipedia. So there must be another article (referred in this article)in which all the facts are explained. That should stand until the "official" media changes or justify its position once and for all. I think that is what shoud have be done in the spanish version of the article. I think the Esmaktub version will do very well and I plan to traduce it. I hope I'll have the time. Rdvarq (talk) 23:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Wiphala into Flag of Cusco. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Unión
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article BAP Unión you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Unión
The article BAP Unión you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:BAP Unión for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 07:41, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Unión
The article BAP Unión you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:BAP Unión for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga -- Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Carrasco (BOP-171)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article BAP Carrasco (BOP-171) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Elelch -- Elelch (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. You cannot review your own nomination. Like before, you have to wait until another editor decides to take up your nomination for review. Please stick to the instructions for nominating an article. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 21:32, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Carrasco (BOP-171)
The article BAP Carrasco (BOP-171) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:BAP Carrasco (BOP-171) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of BAP Carrasco (BOP-171)
The article BAP Carrasco (BOP-171) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:BAP Carrasco (BOP-171) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Editing logged out
I've noticed that you've been editing logged out with Special:contributions/200.37.167.59. Although not a good idea, it is not against policy unless it constitutes WP:LOUTSOCK, which it does, for example, at Shining Path where you and your IP are supporting each other in a slow edit war. This is your only warning. If you violate policy again in this manner, you risk being blocked. The easiest way to avoid this is to edit only when logged in.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--WMrapids (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

ANI-notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WMrapids (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --WMrapids (talk) 22:27, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

CS1 error on 2022 Peruvian self-coup attempt
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2022 Peruvian self-coup attempt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:32, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_Peruvian_self-coup_attempt&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1158893386%7C2022%20Peruvian%20self-coup%20attempt%5D%5D Ask for help])

Notification
Hopefully this will help solve things.--WMrapids (talk) 19:48, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Move review for Operation Gideon (2020)
An editor has asked for a Move review of Operation Gideon (2020). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. WMrapids (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)