User talk:Elem stat learning

November 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Emily Gorcenski. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy
Wikipedia is based upon reliable secondary sources. If you cannot find reliable secondary sources discussing Gorcenski's employment, work history, or social media jokes... then none of it belongs in her biography. This is non-negotiable black-letter policy. As a new user, I strongly suggest you review WP:RS, WP:BLP, WP:NPOV and other foundational policies before contributing further. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 22:41, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Emily Gorcenski. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Emily Gorcenski. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)