User talk:Elena Krsteva1

Welcome!
Hello, Elena Krsteva1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Ad School Master, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AntiDionysius (talk) 12:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ad School Master


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ad School Master, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:50, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Reply
Please read the following regarding writing an article


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line, so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls


 * Your text had no references, and no evidence that it met the notability guidelines, since all you posted was fact-free spam


 * you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.


 * Just pure spam, some examples include No high level advice, no fluff. Just 100% actionable strategies and tips that work in Digital Marketing... Always Updated: No need to worry about the outdated stuff. Our study material is always up-to-date... Digital Marketing Course 5.0 is all about getting you RESULTS. Works In Any Industry: People who are achieving success from our training come from various industries like ethnic-wear stores, e-commerce, etc. The rest is just the same blatant spam


 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Your only edit here was a full-length advertisement, and you said  Our study material is always up-to-date... People who are achieving success from our training. You have an obvious conflict of interest and should have declared it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You did not disclose your COI.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request an unblock In your reasons, you must: To do this, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
 * Provide a new username.

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:52, 14 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Elena, referenced or not, what you wrote was blatant spam for a topic in which you have an undeclared conflict of interest, not even vaguely resembling an encyclopaedia article. I'll leave it to an uninvolved admin to consider your request, but it would be a travesty if you were allowed to continue spamming here, whatever you do on Macedonian Wikipedia, and you seem to have no other purpose on en-wiki Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:08, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request, but what is acceptable on the Macedonian Wikipedia is not necessarily acceptable here. Each version of Wikipedia is a separate project, with their own editors and policies. If your text is acceptable on the Macedonian Wikipedia, that's where it should be. Even if I believe that you are doing this as a favor for a friend, that is still a conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 19:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Reply
The text should not be on our Wikipedia, but on the English Wikipedia, where the database is, and then it will be translated into other languages. And what kind of conflict of interest are we talking about? Wikipedia is for publishing articles of all kinds, about courses, animals, cars, biographies, football players, etc. A clear example is an article that I wrote about my father, who is a soccer player and a top athlete, a representative. Is that ALSO a conflict of interest? Be realistic!
 * Yes, that is entirely a conflict of interest. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 21:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * No, it isn't! Just as there can be biographies about other footballers, so there can be about my father, because he is also a footballer. It's a bit discriminatory of you. Just as there are articles about other companies that hold courses, so it is with this one that I want to write. And it doesn't matter who wrote the article, it's important to see how much that person contributed (I just took the article about football players as an example, as well as the article about the online course itself!) Elena Krsteva1 (talk) 22:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * No, that is a conflict of interest, and yes it does matter who wrote the article. Please actually read the conflict of interest policy, it makes both of those things very clear. AntiDionysius (talk) 12:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)