User talk:Elenamoroz

July 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Needle-exchange programme, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Needle-exchange programme was changed by Elenamoroz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852243 on 2012-07-06T13:21:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Why ClueBot thought you were a vandal
Earlier today, ClueBot undid an extensive series of edits that you made because some of your edits seemed like those of a vandal. I reverted ClueBot's revert, then made a report.

Here is ClueBot's explanation on why it thought you were a vandal: ClueBot Report ID=1137128.

From what I can see, among your extensive edits were replacing a number of PMC references with ones that you may have thought were better or more relevant, but which were not accessible since they were across a paywall. I think you should consider putting the references back to what they were originally, and be careful in the future.

Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for reverting cluebots revert... those references I added are definitely more relevant and up to date, but I will try to find ones that are more accessible. Thank you once again, I am new to this!


 * You're welcome. ClueBot NG is one of the more important and best-appreciated bots monitoring Wikipedia. Its algorithms catch 40% of vandalism attempts within seconds of their posting, but about 0.1% of the time, it makes a mistake. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 15:40, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

You have lots of repeats in the reference list. In Citing sources we learn how to do repeated citations: For multiple use of the same citation or footnote, you can also use the named references feature, choosing a name to identify the citation, and typing  . Thereafter, the same footnote may be reused any number of times by typing just  . For more details of this syntax, see Multiple references to the same footnote on the footnotes help page. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 03:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Just taking note of some talk going on in the background...
User talk:Minphie &mdash; Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 09:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)