User talk:Eleonorahon

Wikidata

 * Alenka Kham Picman, born 1932,slovene architect, painter, graphic artist, studied with Josef Plecnik - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28975981
 * Norma De Saint Picman, born 1963, slovene, french intermedia artist, painter, sculptor, performance artist - https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q81093183

thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:32, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for opening pages!!! Will start shortly to fill some data, please revise then if they are properly formulated, when it’s possible for you Eleonorahon (talk) 03:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello dear Tagishsimon, thanks again for opening Wikidata for Alenka and me...; Thank you Ipigott
 * I finally started to fill data but still struggle for the article, so I’m starting to create several topics before the main one, but please cd. You give me some help and orientation, to finally obtain not to be erased by editors who does not know much about art . Starting to create also other pages ( Lovro Picman, Lado Kham) and uploading material .My mother actually worked a bit with danish architects at the time she was in Kopenhagen....best regards, Norma Eleonorahon (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . Please let me know if there's anything specific you need help with.--Ipigott (talk) 07:13, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Dear Ipigot, please help me urgently, as the page is being considered for deletion ... as well as Lado Khan, Slovenian architect … Should I start with a personal data window, and then move to specific topics... Eleonorahon (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Apologize / Ipigott, Lado Kham, instead of Kham... Eleonorahon (talk) 10:58, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ipigott, please, all those nominations has been put into place by Lemonaka, who has not seemingly one professional user profile, at least I suppose has not mush in common with Art, Nft or aschitecture, so can not really judge those subjects. On the top of the rest, accused linking with financial interest is out of scope...Please, what can I do ? Eleonorahon (talk) 11:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks Ipigott for revision!! I suppose creating other pages describing works created, will try with this, if it can work properly setting links...; tried to do with Wikidata but is is at point to be delegated, if perhaps you can take a look ...Lado Kham architect as well, in any case, much grateful Eleonorahon (talk) 08:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Eleonorahon. I see you tried to add your name to our mailing Women in Red mailing list. I've now entered it correctly which will ensure you receive our monthly priorities. If you wish to become a member of the project, you can do so by linking to "Join Women in Red" on our WikiProject page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much so grateful...as I am quite struggling with editing text...Many thanks!! Eleonorahon (talk) 17:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Please, can you enter also my mother, Alenka Kham Pičman, architect and painter...!! Eleonorahon (talk) 17:40, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Lado Kham moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Lado Kham, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello please we are gatheriong more information along with photos, documets, etc. but it can be easier for othe people to contrinute if it is visible. Know that in this form it is not enoug but it is only a beginning. Please, I will gather more infos to fill gaps. Eleonorahon (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

There are many documents notably architectural plans that are actually at the Archives of Slovenia, will mention neccessary links, means catalogized numbers for references

Please stop moving this article to the Wikipedia namespace. The Wikipedia namespace is for pages relating to Wikipedia itself. Articles do not belong there. — Cyrius|&#9998; 04:02, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The Wikipedia namespace is not the article namespace. The article namespace has no prefix. Any encyclopedia article with the Wikipedia: prefix is misplaced and will be moved.
 * Also, sending replies as emails is incredibly intrusive and rarely necessary. — Cyrius|&#9998; 04:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Exceptional Women of Excellence/ Exceptional Leaders of Excellence :


A tag has been placed on Exceptional Women of Excellence/ Exceptional Leaders of Excellence : requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.wef.org.in/about-women-economic-forum/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  16:08, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Norma De Saint Picman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norma De Saint Picman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Norma De Saint Picman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. -Lemonaka‎ 10:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello Eleonorahon. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Norma De Saint Picman, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Eleonorahon. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. -Lemonaka‎ 10:19, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Lemonaka, at first, I have NO financial intention, just editing also about work I consider valuable and important. I think zou have no profound knowledgo nor about Art neither NFT nor Metaverse so please coucel with someone that is expert in that. Would appreciate if you kindly put a page to the visibility. Eleonorahon (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Eleonorahon. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 10:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lado Kham


The article Lado Kham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Likely notability issues."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -Lemonaka‎ 10:36, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Lemonaka, Lado Kham works are linked to Slovenian Archives. And again, I am not employed not paid for edits as are you are presuming in previous comments. All material from that arcitect is not yet entirely digitalized and therefore not accessible. Eleonorahon (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * I received your e-mail. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that you did not know that it would be against the rules to post two keep votes under two separate accounts in the same discussion? I am sorry, but I find that very difficult to believe - even if you weren't aware of the specific policy, voting twice under different names is obviously deceptive. I will leave this unblock request open for another administrator to review, but I am not inclined to unblock you at this time. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC) Ok understand that it is hard to believe, but the fact was as I explained, started editioning unintentionally just to provide more sources, so it would be great if some editor can focus more on the content than on the procedure, that was obviously but not intentionaly, controversaly with Wikipedia rules

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging