User talk:ElephantElephant2

May 2024
Thanks for contributing to the article King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 16:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you, I normally do. I will add the citation. ElephantElephant2 (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hanukkah. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Zim Zala Bim talk 19:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Reported. ElephantElephant2 (talk) 22:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Cited, its back. And there's now a cite for the 4th Foot article, too. What's your level of education on Hanukkah? I've studied theology, history, and law pertaining to the holiday and the historical events that it commemorates. ElephantElephant2 (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I urge you to assume good faith and refrain from personal attacks. -- Zim Zala Bim talk 22:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I was not making disruptive edits, I was adding content with citations from reputable sources. ElephantElephant2 (talk) 01:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

I've placed your statement within the request as intended, it should go where the words "your reason here" are. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Thank you, I understand. Still new to all of this.

UTRS appeal #88605
Appellant needs to seriously reconsider their approach. And adjust the unblock request to address the reasons for their block. I see this user a WP:NOTCOMPATIBLE, but maybe some light will dawn after my decline. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I understand, Deepfriedokra, what you mean. Last night was rough for me, I was only trying to make constructive edits, which were repeatedly being deleted. I should have assumed good intentions on the part of the other editor. ElephantElephant2 (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)