User talk:Eleutherosmartin

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

License tagging for Image:Northern Areas 31.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Northern Areas 31.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Northern Areas 38b.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Northern Areas 38b.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Northern Areas 31b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Northern Areas 31b.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Daniel Martin (Scholar), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Corvus cornix talk  00:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.  Corvus cornix talk  00:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.  Corvus cornix talk  00:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Please note that I didn't delete the article, an admin did. that means that the admin reviewed the same article I did and came to the same conclusion that I did. You'll need to read WP:BIO, WP:RS and WP:COI, the Wikipedia policies and guidelines that discuss this issue. No offense to you, but your academic achievements don't meet the Wikipedia requirements for notability. Of course, as I am sure you do, if you disagree with me and with the admin who did the deletion, you can list the article at WP:DRV.  Corvus cornix talk  04:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Northern Areas 39b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Northern Areas 39b.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

"IMPORTANT and "SIGNIFICANT"
This is not something that we can address at the article level. You need to bring this up on the Talk pages at WP:BIO and WP:N. WP:V also comes into play here.  Corvus cornix talk  04:26, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: Roane Mountain images
No problem. Images larger than 300-350px tend to be discouraged except in particular circumstances, such as panoramic views (and even then, they should be kept to a minimum size). It's mostly to keep things clean-looking on the articles, but also because they are considered just that, thumbnails, with the larger image just a click away. — Huntster (talk • email • contribs) 00:37, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * BTW: Thanks for contributing those beautiful images. You sure get to some nice spots. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 20:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability issues
Hi, perhaps I can help. There seem to be two different articles under discussion, one for an award and one for an award-winner. As the basis of the notability of the latter seems to depend on the former, let's keep things simple by just focussing on the former?

We (should) agree that a notable award is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. Defining notability is tricky and often subjective. We have reams of material that help us decide, but there are still cracks. An often-used shortcut is that the topic has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial references in reliable sources.

So let's start with that. Do you believe you can lay your hands on multiple, non-trivial references to this award, from reliable sources? (bearing in mind our definition of "reliable sources"!)

Cheers, --Dweller (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:DanielMartin.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DanielMartin.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 01:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Miar.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Miar.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

License for Image:Nanga Parbat 045b.jpg
The image Nanga Parbat 045b.jpg is a candidate to be copied to the Wikimedia Commons. When you uploaded this image, you licensed it for use under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). On behalf of the Wikipedia and Commons communities, thank you. However, the GFDL requires that reproductions of the image (and any other GFDL-licenced works), must be accompanied by the full text of the GFDL. The GFDL is intended more for documentation and not images, so downstream re-users may be hindered by additional restrictions of the GFDL which may not work well on the use of one image.

Before I copy this image to the Commons, I wanted to ask whether you would be willing to multilicense your work under an additional license, such as a Creative Commons licence. Creative Commons licences, such as the Attribution Share-Alike license provide a similar copyleft permission to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements such as the distribution of the licence text. All you need to do, is place the additional license tag alongside your current license. Users can choose between which one they want to use the image under. There are many free licenses accepted on Wikipedia and Commons which can provide freedoms similar to the GFDL, but without some of its requirements.

You are under no obligation whatsoever to alter the license. Doing so merely cooperates with those members of the community who believe that multilicensing your work can ease the reuse of images outside of Wikipedia.

If you use a GFDL license tag which requires distribution of Wikipedia's general disclaimer (indicated by "Subject to disclamiers" in the template), it is also suggested that you switch it to one which does not apply them.

It is also strongly advised, to update to the 1.3 version of the GFDL.

Whether or not you choose to dual-license your work, thank you for your consideration.

Also affected: Thanks! --Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:Northern Areas 39b.jpg
 * Image:Northern Areas 31b.jpg
 * Image:Northern Areas 31.jpg
 * Image:Northern Areas 38b.jpg
 * Image:Northern Areas 06.jpg

NowCommons: File:Miar peak.JPG
File:Miar peak.JPG is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Miar Peak.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Miar2.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Miar Peak2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Throop Peak Mount Hawkins 033.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Throop Peak Mount Hawkins 033.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

File:PA130757.JPG
This is a great picture, but I doubt that it shows Shispare. I think the main peak is Ultar Sar (Ultar II). Shispare is supposed to be behind the ridge. Anyway, I'm going to move the image to commons and edit the discription. Hope you don't mind...--Rupert Pupkin (talk) 10:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Nanga Parbat 002y.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Nanga Parbat 002y.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Nanga Parbat 028.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Nanga Parbat 028.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)