User talk:ElfEsteem

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magpie Games has been accepted
 Magpie Games, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Magpie_Games help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! bonadea contributions talk 16:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Indie games
Hey there, thanks for picking up where User:Allcatsarebabes more or less left off; they were doing some good work, so I hope they come back sooner or later. They had been working on Draft:Hit Point Press, Draft:Avery Alder, Draft:Jeeyon Shim, and Draft:Jonaya Kemper, some of which I see you were also working on, so hopefully those get published sooner or later as well. :) BOZ (talk) 21:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you think Draft:Hit Point Press looks good enough now to publish as a stub? I just went in to add the wiki links for the IGDN awards because I was working on those, but the article seems fine to me if you want to move it to article space.
 * Draft:Avery Alder looks fine too. Looks like whoever reviewed it a few weeks ago said all the sources were about "Quiet Year," but there are sources for a lot of things now. What do you think?
 * I haven't looked at the other articles you mentioned. Is there anything in particular they need? ElfEsteem (talk) 23:19, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, never mind, it looks like today Avery Alder got accepted and Draft:Hit Point Press got rejected for not having enough press yet to be considered notable. ElfEsteem (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hit Point Press (April 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hit Point Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hit_Point_Press Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hit_Point_Press reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

BackerKit moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, BackerKit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 13:44, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:BackerKit
Hello, ElfEsteem. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BackerKit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:BackerKit


Hello, ElfEsteem. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BackerKit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)