User talk:Elfiq Networks

The article User:Elfiq Networks has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * When we edit Wikipedia, we agree not edit in any areas where we have a conflict of interest. Knowing that you cannot edit any articles related to your company, employer, etc., which articles would you like to edit? TN X Man  15:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Are you aware of any third-party review articles, for instance in the trade press, that comment on whether link load balancers are actually needed? If you go ahead and write an article that does nothing but cite your own company's website, it would probably not be suitable for Wikipedia. We use comments by outsiders as a way of ensuring objectivity in our articles. Even on your website, I did not notice citations of any outside publications independent of your company that comment on Elfiq. EdJohnston (talk) 14:44, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi - taking over from a previous colleague, no longer here, who tried something on Wikipedia. For the part of 3rd party press, I recommend this one: http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2011/06/27/5599292.htm - we no longer post articles talking about us on our web site. My guess is that the original article was left unfinished. Our competitors have pages on Wikipedia, here they are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mushroom_Networks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radware http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F5_Networks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barracuda_Networks

Would it be possible to re-activate the account and we'll follow the guidelines?

Many thanks for this,