User talk:EliFlo27/sandbox

Article evaluation
Excellent work - you gave a critical review of the entry and even practiced creating the table of contents. - Kquave (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review
I really liked your addition to your chosen article. The page you chose definitely needed a section on the background and history of the wage gap. What really impressed me was the comprehensiveness and totality in which you covered almost 100 years of history of the wage gap spanning back to the 1930s. You brought up specific examples and statistics but also incorporated an overall neutral tone to your addition. If I had to say one thing, I might change the structure slightly making it a little more organized chronologically for the reader to more easily follow. Maybe separate into more paragraphs, more transitions, outline each decade, or something; but that is a very minor detail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicholas grant18 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 21 October 2018 (UTC)