User talk:Elibrarysg/Archive 9

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leah Jaye (June 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! BethNaught (talk) 09:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Leah Jaye.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Elibrarysg Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BethNaught&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Elibrarysg reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The use of see also's
Since when have see also's been used to include every article an individual receives a passing mention in? I believe see also's should be used sparingly, e.g. for a scientist noted for work on X-ray fluorescence, a see also X-ray fluorescence would strike me as acceptable. However casual use of see alsos, in this case directing to long unreleated alumni lists in which the subject only recives a passing mention could get very messy indeed. You could also add, India, Botany, Academia, Queen Elizabeth College, King's College London, University of London, Patna University, to the see also list in question here but it would start to look a bit silly. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 22:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Flaming Ferrari (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Wow this editor considers me as a troll!!! Cute! Elibrarysg (talk) 23:10, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 23:19, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

User's own talk pages
Per WP:UP Policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or unregistered users, from removing comments from their own talk pages... Jim1138 (talk) 00:13, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Noted. Thank you. Elibrarysg (talk) 00:17, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Not vandalism
That removal from Denis Alexander would be considered a wp:content dispute, not wp:vandalism. You also appear to be edit warring, so for balance: You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Denis Alexander. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 00:19, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ANI
BTW: you need to notify subjects of ANI discussion that you start or elsewhere that it might be appropriate or courteous to do so. ANI-notice (I use and add the thread name) User or ping can be used to do so for non-ANI. has been notified by another. See WP:ANI red box at top. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 03:36, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Leah Jaye concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Leah Jaye, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC)