User talk:Elinorbambi

October 2023
Hello, I'm Catalyzzt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Matthew Gray Gubler have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Catalyzzt (talk) 12:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 *  HE IS NOT FAMOUD ENOUGH TO BE REPORTED EVERYTHING HE SAYS ON A NEWS OUTLET. HIS SHOW HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME AND IT LOOSES ATTENTION.
 * the only reliable thing secondary is reddit and criminal minds (the show he is on) Wikipedia page. other famous celeb has that written in their bio i don't see why he can't. Elinorbambi (talk) 22:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * he said these in podcasts. Elinorbambi (talk) 22:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Matthew Gray Gubler. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 00:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * PLEASE REPLY TO MY COMMENT THEN !!!!
 * HE IS NOT FAMOUD ENOUGH TO BE REPORTED EVERYTHING HE SAYS ON A NEWS OUTLET. HIS SHOW HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LONG TIME AND IT LOOSES ATTENTION.
 * the only reliable thing "secondary" source not podcast or his parent's interviews are reddit and the show he is on Wikipedia page.
 * other famous celeb has religion and divorce in their bio, i don't see why he can't just bc he is not famous enough to be reported. Elinorbambi (talk) 01:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)