User talk:Eliowwwwwwth/sandbox

Article Evaluation
Eliowwwwwwth (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

This is the review of Rent control in New York

Overall, this article gives me a clear and straight forward understanding of what rent control is, and how it evolved in New York from time to time in different periods in the history. However, since the editor was trying to give so many knowledge of different law terms and governmental regulations, like in section "History", I was a little bit distracted and felt difficult to understand the regulation terms.

I think this article is very neutral and objective. Since the main purpose of the article is to offer an basic and general understanding of the topic - rent control in New York, all the evidence are used from believable sources to make claims about the topic. From my point of view, there is no bias against any party in this article.

As I discussed before, I think the editor over-represented the law terms and various governmental regulations in this article. From my point of view. for some people have no interests in laws or governmental regulations, but only want to know what is rent control and how it evolves in New York, all these over-representations are kind of distracted.

After read through the entire article, I found that some of the links are not working well. For example, in the first paragraph, the link of "rent stabilization" did take me to an non-working web page. Also, some of the link title did not match the title of the article which the editor referenced from. So, this is a little bit confusing, because the title are different. Besides, the article introduces a lot of history about the regulation of rent control, so it involves a lot of times, like "1962 - 1984". However, the editor did not provide the evidence to prove the years are right in the history. Except, the points that I discussed, I think the sources and provided evidence are supportive to the topic. Especially, the editor gave a statistic support about " Rent unit distribution", and also linked the source where he/she cited. And the source is from a believable organization.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eliowwwwwwth (talk • contribs) 15:21, 4 April 2018 (UTC)