User talk:Elite194

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jerdesz1.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Jerdesz1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Regarding the image you uploaded
What we need to do is to verify that it is indeed you who is the copyright holder of the image (as it could be anybody uploading it and claiming to be the owner which would violate copyright). Here's what you need to do:


 * 1) Send an email using language from this page to [mailto:permissions-commons@wikimedia.org permissions-commons@wikimedia.org]
 * 2) Upload the file to Wikimedia Commons and place OTRS pending on the image page.

Someone will reply to your email, indicating whether the content and your license is acceptable and update the page to indicate that the confirmation of the license has been received. Hope this helps, –MuZemike 00:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for offering to sort that out. I have changed the notice on the image so that it wont be deleted in a week. The email will go to some different people rather than MuZemike or me, but if you want to report a vandal without posting on a page, you can also email me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Taylor1s.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taylor1s.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ xplicit  02:52, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Taylor2s.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taylor2s.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ xplicit  02:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Georginavaughn1s.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Georginavaughn1s.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --— ξ xplicit  03:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taylor Kearns


A tag has been placed on Taylor Kearns, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Calton | Talk 13:55, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Julianna Erdesz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julianna Erdesz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julianna Erdesz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.