User talk:Eliteembassy

Welcome!

Hello, Eliteembassy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Worldwide Elite Embassy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 23:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of The Worldwide Elite Embassy


A tag has been placed on The Worldwide Elite Embassy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  RepublicanJacobite  TheFortyFive 23:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, on the twin grounds of lack of indication of importance, and being entirely promotional.

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Mere existence is not sufficient. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release Don't use adjectives of praise. Don't include text like " The booking division is available for those who would like Exclusive or Non-Exclusive Booking Services. The Embassy also has filled a gap in regard to the publishing of musical works since this service may be difficult for most new artists to acquire. Having a publisher is an important part of a recording artist's career." Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

A suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's much more difficult. If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity. It would have to be very different from what you submitted. If you do have the source for notability, you can give it a try. If you don't, I would advise you to not even try, because there is no chance the article will be acceptable.

For further information see our FAQ about business, organizations, and articles like this and also WP:FIRST.

However, since the name you have used includes or refers to the subject of the article, you must choose another username. As explained in WP:USER, only individuals may edit. When you have a username that is or includes the name of your organization, you imply that you are editing officially, and have a superior right to edit the page. But that is not the way WP works. Therefore, if you do continue, please choose another name. On that user   page, you should say whom you are working for. If I can help you further, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 9 October 2011 (UTC)