User talk:ElizabethOliphint/sandbox

Peer Review for plans for Aphrodite of Knidos article: Overall it looks like you plan to add a lot of information, but without sources listed for what you plan on adding, it reads more like your opinion, or possibly the opinion of only one art historian. For example, the reading we did in class on the Aphrodite mentioned how her idealized form was meant to attract both heterosexual and homosexual male viewers, not necessarily that she was made to look like a real Greek woman from that time. If you have a source that does assert that, I'd suggest adding in both opinions and clearly stating that they are the opinions of the source authors. Also with the amount of information you plan to add collecting as many sources as you can will be important if you want to achieve neutrality in your article. I would also start considering what sections you're going to have and where each bit of information you collect will fit in to those sections. As you have it now, it doesn't read like an article outline. Aside from that, I highly commend you on choosing an article that seems to have so much information already contained in it! I feel like that would make it more difficult than starting on an article that has little to no information yet. Good luck! Babuwat (talk) 22:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)