User talk:Elizabeth A

Welcome
Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.

You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.

If you have any questions, see help, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!


 * If you made any edits before you got an account, see assigning those to your username.
 * You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: . If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
 * If you think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.

Again, welcome! - Flockmeal 05:06, Apr 10, 2004 (UTC)

Top Ten Lang WPs
Please see Wikipedialang talk. +sj+

Hallo
Willkommen zu Wikipedia. Hier Japan regnet es stark. Wie geht's dir? Schoenes Wochenende! KIZU 14:57, 15 May 2004 (UTC)

Nicholas Copernicus
Your contribution to the article is humorous. How is Torun not historical name? Poles always refereed to the city as Torun or Thorun, Germans always as Thorn. Both are historical name. Also, Royal Prussia was not "undr protection" of Polish king. It was his property. It was incorporated into Poland in peace of Torun. Szopen 07:29, 18 May 2004 (UTC)

Your edits on Germany
I'm about to tune down my Wikipedia presence, at least temporarily due to pending exams, but let me assure you that as a student of political science, my textbooks, regardless of if they originated in the US, in Britain or on the European Continent, and regardless of if their first edition had been printed before or after 1991, if they at all made references to Westernness or Western Europe, they connect post-1945 Germany and Switzerland (and indirectly thereby also Liechtenstein) with Western and not Central Europe.

As many have argued at different talk pages, it's possible that this lable is about to change, but an encyclopedia has by necessity to be conservative and follow the usage, not lead changed usage.

It's undoubtly so, that the last years of crisis in the European union, in NATO, and of course also the enlargement of EU has put questions on France's and Germany's possible role as leaders for the Union in focus. Your stance seem to represent one of the wings in this debate, which you personally is fully entitled to do - I might even agree with you, at least partly. But Wikipedia is not suitable as a battlefield in ongoing debates between countries. Please read up on Wikipedia's NPOV policy!

As more than one have remarked at different talk pages, your style of repeatedly restoring your prefered version regardless of any concerns raised, is unsuitable for a cooperative project as this.

I urge you to consider your approach to cooperation at Wikipedia.

Regards!

/Tuomas 13:39, 23 May 2004 (UTC)

You may have noticed that both the Britannica and the Columbia encyclopedias states that Germany is a country of central, not western, Europe. If people believe Germany is a western European country, they should cite some reliable sources. I agree that Wikipedia should follow the usage.

Also, I am not the person repeatedly restoring my version without giving any good explanation at the talk page. Elizabeth A 13:45, 23 May 2004 (UTC)

You are right, that you have cited printed encyclopedias. That's good, but you have to realize that an almost hundred years old Britannica is relevant for the usage then, not now. What you have not done, and what I urge you to start doing, is to put yourself in the position of people you fight with, or in general in the position of editors you don't automatically agree with. It sounds presumtuous, of course, but that's what I've tried to. My ambition was to give other contributors, including you, an example of how to do that. Others could surely have done it better, but so far it seemed more of a trench war. Other times I'll play the role of the one who argues for changes, and then I'll also put efforts into printed references and external links, but this time, I tried to put reason to a war that reflects badly on Wikipedia, and where you are one of the parties.

I do also recall to have seen a list of www-links somewhere, but at this moment I don't remember where: A list that allegedly should have supported the notion of Central Europe delimited by Danube and Oder-Neisse, or something. Please realize, that Central Europe is not one of my particular interests. Which doesn't hinder me to know what everyone else knows, i.e. that Germany–Liechtenstein–Switzerland is not what "particularly in the Western World" is primarily thought of as Central Europe. Austria may well be given a prominent notion, but the Slavonic countries have to be given a more promiente mentioning than Liechtenstein or Switzerland! Please remember that so it was until May 6th, and I did not restore "my" version, not even the pre-May version, but I tried to establish a balanced wording between the point of view that you represent and that of the pre-May version.

A personal note is that what Finland ultimately fought for 1899-1991 was the "membership" in Western Europe, ideologically and culturally, to which we feel a strong identification. Seen with the eyes of a Finn, Germany before 1945 or 1918 was both Central and West-European, but after 1945 only the Western parts remained in a geographical sense, but more important: in a cultural sense, that that had been "strange" and Central European (strange in a positive way, though!) with German and Austrian culture, its roots had been severed by the Iron Curtain, and post-War West Germany was as a consequence less strange and didn't seem the slightestly Central European any more. /Tuomas 15:00, 23 May 2004 (UTC)

Central Europe
Dear Elizabeth A, I noticed that your edits in the Central Europe are beginning to resemble an edit war. Deletion of the map with the This map is pov comment certainly does not explain what is wrong with it. Please be so kind as to explain why do you find political organizations equal to geographical terms. Halibutt 14:42, Jun 17, 2004 (UTC)

License
Hi, you had uploaded Image:Reichsgruendung2.jpg without giving its license. We use it on french wp and I'd like to know if it is Public Domain or something like that. Tipiac 13:20, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * And also Image:De wappen2.png


 * Speaking of images, Image:De wappen.png is probably going to get deleted as redundant with Image:Bundesadler.png. 68.39.174.238 19:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Germany wappen.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Germany wappen.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. - AWeenieMan (talk) 21:49, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Reichsgruendung.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reichsgruendung.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Reichstagopening.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reichstagopening.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Reichstagopening.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reichstagopening.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:32, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Germanymiddle.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Germanymiddle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Reichstagopening.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Reichstagopening.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)