User talk:Eljacko

your article
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The craiig may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Friday (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Choess 20:44, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Do *not* remove speedy deletion tags from articles you have authored; if you feel they have been placed in error, use Template:hangon. Choess 23:30, 14 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, your article The craiig has been deleted on purpose. Please don't just keep re-creating it.  This is an encyclopedia, so we don't have much use for this content.  Friday (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Verifiable and notability
You should be aware of WP:V, a core editorial policy here that requires information used in articles to be verifiable. In particular, I have doubts as to whether Knights of Northumbria contains any verifiable information. Also, very minor political figures such as Daniel Mayne may not be considered "notable" by some editors. See WP:BIO for a guide to inclusion of biographies. Friday (talk) 17:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did with Daniel Mayne. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Tonywalton | Talk 17:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't know that it's vandalism or nonsense, but it looks unverifiable to me. Friday (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I have semi-deleted these articles for now. If references can be added, feel free to undelete and add the references.  Some thought Daniel Mayne was a hoax due to a particularly suspect sentence.  If you're intentionally putting in hoaxes, please be aware that this is most definitely considered vandalism and will make you unpopular in a hurry, possibly including being blocked from editing.  If these are serious attempts at articles that simply do not have sources yet, you can improve them by adding sources.  Friday (talk) 18:03, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments removal
BTW, it's no big deal or anything, but it's generally considered bad to remove comments (even your own) from a talk page. If you no longer agree with what you'd previously written, our convention is to strike out the comments, like this, generally accompanied by further explanation. The problem with removing them is it makes talk pages harder to follow; anyone reading a reply to a removed statement can no longer see what it was in reply to, and this may make things appear to not make sense. Friday (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)