User talk:Ella Sjødyr

Siri Leknes
The enWP expects rather fuller articles on academic scientist. Make sure the articles contain the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates, and, in the humanities, a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher and ISBN (referenced to WorldCat); but in the sciences, the 5 most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them. (The total citations for an individualare not considered significant evidence--it is important work that counts, not merely a great deal ofwork) And any national level awards--not junior awwards or awards. from their own university) Very sparse articles attract skepticism. as do those using vague claims and superlatives, or those that list all possible internal and external committes.  DGG ( talk ) 06:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Department of Psychology, NTNU for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Department of Psychology, NTNU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Department of Psychology, NTNU until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 08:25, 9 October 2019 (UTC)