User talk:Ellekiko

Welcome
Hello, Ellekiko and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished!  Just ' i ' yaya  15:23, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Ellekiko, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Bad sources
Hi. Re this edit: never cite the Daily Mail. This also applies to MailOnline. DS (talk) 16:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Okay. I have a source from the Guardian I will add here. Thanks! Ellekiko (talk) 16:35, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Another important lesson is to not misinterpret what sources actually say. Read the Guardian's article more carefully, and you'll see that the statements you mentioned, were not actually in reference to TVHC. Furthermore, the scholarly article under discussion didn't mention TVHC at all. DS (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * "From The Very Hungry Caterpillar to the Cat in the Hat, Peter Rabbit to Babar, children's books are dominated by male central characters, new research has found, with the gender disparity sending children a message that "women and girls occupy a less important role in society than men or boys". Here is a direct quote from the Guardian article, I will update the section to reflect the disparity and effect reflected here. Thanks! Ellekiko (talk) 15:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I've read the McCabe article now. In order to add the statement criticizing TVHC in the way you've done, you would need to cite a much more specific source making that criticism. As you've done it, it amounts to a violation of WP:SYNTHESIS, as best I can tell. The Guardian article is - by adding specific books not mentioned in the McCabe study - doing what news reporters often do: stretching the story to make it more striking or appealing to their readers. But we're not willing to extend the authority of the scholarly article behind the news story to embellishments made by the reporter.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 03:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)