User talk:Ellgee24

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! EricEnfermero  Howdy! 04:16, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Brayton Purcell, LLP, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! AppleJack7 Dear Princess Celestia...   00:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome!
jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Brayton Purcell, LLP
Hello, I reverted your removal of well-referenced information from the article. If you are connected with this law firm, I suggest that you read conflict of interest. It may be that the article as currently written places undue weight on a single case. But it is not appropriate to remove well-referenced content without discussion or an explanation. Expansion of the article in compliance with policies and guidelines is the best solution. I know that you are new to Wikipedia, but you have to understand that we are here to build a neutral, well referenced encyclopedia. We don't host promotional articles about law firms or any other businesses. Once you introduced the topic to Wikipedia, you opened up the article to editing by anyone, anywhere, who wants to edit the article in compliance with our policies and guidelines. Feel free to ask questions on my talk page.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)