User talk:Elliott Bursey

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! GAtechnical (talk) 12:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Streiner's Taxonomy of Tasks, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mblumber (talk) 04:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/That's-Not-All Technique concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/That's-Not-All Technique, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lewin's Leadership Studies


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lewin's Leadership Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://books.google.ca/books?id=RsMNiobZojIC&pg=PA272&lpg=PA272&dq=%22the+three+types+of+leadership+resulted+in+differences+in+efficiency,+satisfaction,+and+aggressiveness%22&source=bl&ots=FFLtsw5MRU&sig=pIZQ2HqOymX_MG7EdG9cQGH8V7Q&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Kik1Uue9I_TU2QWutoHoAg&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22the%20three%20types%20of%20leadership%20resulted%20in%20differences%20in%20efficiency%2C%20satisfaction%2C%20and%20aggressiveness%22&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 03:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Streiner's Taxonomy of Tasks


The article Streiner's Taxonomy of Tasks has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Repeat of material in the (correctly-spelled) article Steiner's Taxonomy of Tasks

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RolandR (talk) 00:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)