User talk:Ellismanuel

Problems with upload of File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 12:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

deletion
Hi, you can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~ I deleted your article because it made promotional claims without references to independent verifiable sources. Some examples of such claims The whole thing appears to be WP:OR and spam. You need to distinguish what is provable fact from what is religious belief, and provide independent references for both the facts and the claims  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:58, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * honoured as the Queen and Patroness
 * miraculous
 * History section is stated as fact but doesn't have a single reference to prove the claims, or even to demonstrate that this is what is believed by followers
 * Miracles section is stated as fact but doesn't have a single reference to prove the claims, or even to demonstrate that this is what is believed by followers
 * The devotion and strong faith to the Blessed Virgin of Guadalupe and to the Holy Cross of Jesus saved the people from the epidemic -- sources needed to prove this is true
 * story of the fall of the statue - no sources. This happened in full view of many people who joined in the procession. so there should be references
 * From then on, devotion to the Blessed Virgin of Guadalupe spread throughout Cebu, its neighboring islands and throughout the world. unsourced spam
 * Numerous miraculous events have transpired through the decades and the people of Cebu and from other parts of the world owe these miracles to Cebu's beloved Queen - spam

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe de Cebu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  02:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Santo Niño de Cebu(2).jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Santo Niño de Cebu(2).jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)