User talk:Ellysopohie

Welcome!
Hello, Ellysopohie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Daniel Niazi, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Electric Catfish 13:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

What is the reason that you delete articles that are based on facts? --Ellysopohie (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:Notability, most of the time (WP:BIO being particularly relevant), as well as WP:BLP sometimes. I could write an article about my cat, for instance, that is 100% factually true and even verified by reliable sources. My cat still isn't notable. - Vianello (Talk) 17:34, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Niazi


The article Daniel Niazi has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Electric Catfish 13:53, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Daniel Niazi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  17:18, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Daniel Niazi. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  23:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Daniel Niazi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Noom talk stalk 23:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to Daniel Niazi. Noom talk stalk 23:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Daniel Niazi, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  13:49, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for removal of AfD templates after final warning, vandalizing template pages, and employing false page protection templates, as you did at Daniel Niazi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 17:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Daniel Niazi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  22:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
This is your last warning. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Daniel Niazi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t &bull; c &raquo;  05:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Niazi


A tag has been placed on Daniel Niazi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 09:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Daniel Niazi, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 09:45, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Niazi Jacobsen


A tag has been placed on Daniel Niazi Jacobsen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Prestonmag (talk) 11:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Daniel Niazi Jacobsen
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. AllyD (talk) 11:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Community consensus
There is a community consensus that Daniel Niazi is not a suitable subject for a biography here. By repeatedly re-creating the article, now under changing names, you are acting against that consensus. Please cease and desist. AllyD (talk) 11:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 14:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)