User talk:Elmmarketing

- Neonorange (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Rebecca Donovan
Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia; I hope you will enjoy editing here.

I noticed your recent edits to this article. I removed these edits for the following reasons. Your first edit adds the phrase "eagerly anticipated", and is promotional in tone rather than encyclopedic. The second edit was an improvement on the previous version, but a comma is better than a dash. Keep in mind that statements in a Wikipedia article must be supported by a cite of a reliable source.

I also have a concern about the user name you have picked. It suggests your account is that of a company rather than that of an individual. Such names are not permitted, as they are considered promotional.

If you think I have misunderstood your position, or have made a mistake, please place a message on my talk page or discuss your edits on the talk page of the article.

If you are working for a company engaged in promotion work for Rebecca Donovan or involved publishers, you have a conflict of interest, and should suggest edits on the article talk page rather than directly editing the article.

You are completely free to edit Wikipedia articles on subjects where you do not have a conflict of interest. However, your selected user name, elmmarketing, does seem to be problematic per Wikipedia username policies promotional (company name) and shared use. - Neonorange (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Problematic edits of the Wikipedia article Rebecca Donovan
Your new edits to Rebecca Donovan have problems that need to be corrected:
 * it is a violation to place cited uncited material in the biography of a living person, see WP:BLP
 * the bulk of your additions are copied and pasted (see WP:CP) from http://totallybookedblog.com/2013/07/15/interview-with-rebecca-donovan-and-giveaway-toda/; this is a possible copyright violation (see WP:CV)
 * your additions are promotional in tone rather than encyclopedic (see WP:NOTADVERTISING).

Please discuss your changes at Talk:Rebecca Donovan. You have not replied to my concern about your user name. Your recent additions lead me to believe that you are engaged in promotional work and have a conflict of interest on this article (see WP:COI). - Neonorange (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * These edits (April 7) have now been reverted pending a response or appropriate amendments to the article. {Note that the above comment should read "uncited" - we wish more people would insert cited material in articles of all types!) Noyster   (talk),  16:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)