User talk:Elmorgan

I have a question regarding valid acceptable references and sourcing for new articles.

For technical entries, are articles and reports from industry-leading analysts (such as Gartner, IDC, Forrester Research, etc.) considered valid?

Thanks for your help!

Elmorgan (talk) 17:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you need help with? xenocidic (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Right, sorry, I forgot to check back on you. I think those would probably be valid, yes. See WP:RS for more on what Wikipedia considers a reliable source. Also, don't forget to sign your posts with ~ . Cheers, xenocidic (talk) 18:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem, I figured out who posted it by looking at my talk page history =). See above for your answer. xenocidic (talk) 18:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * As long as the sources are reliable, 3rd party, published documents, you should be ok. I gather the analysts you mention would meet these criteria. xenocidic (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks so much! I really appreciate your help.

Elmorgan (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Any time. enjoy the following welcome template, you may find it useful. xenocidic (talk) 18:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Managed file transfer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Managed file transfer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Managed file transfer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vectro (talk) 21:52, 10 May 2019 (UTC)