User talk:Elnerdo

I reverted you change to PAL Spyware Remover because it was unencyclopedic. Where as I agree with what you said it still needed to be reverted for the above reason.--John Lakonias 19:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello saw your message on your userpage. You put a message on mine so you have already done it. Your user page is where you can put some information about yourself. I would advise against puting anything personal like email address or address or anything of that nature though. Below is a welcome with some useful information for editing since you hadn't had one yet. Welcome to Wikipedia.--John Lakonias 06:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Is there a reason not to have the PAL Spyware Remover page (www.palsol.com) as an external link? When I read "What should be linked to" I reckon this is one of the items which should be linked. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links#What_should_be_linked_to I will qualify that to say that the disclaimer "Enter at your own risk" is required. Any comments? Parasite 08:19, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I would be all-for placing it back on the page. elnerdo 19:24, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

I reverted the edit because of enter at your own risk as being unencyclopedic. No problem with the link itself on my part. Is there a link to include removal of the program because if someone downloads it they are going to have to remove it if their firewall or virus protecter doesn't nip it in the bud?--John Lakonias 06:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Maybe do it and explain why on the Talk:Pal_Spyware_Remover page? Parasite 00:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --John Lakonias 06:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

User talk:24.190.154.4‎
You need to supply evidence that you have any authority to make such requests on behalf of the school. I assume that you're a pupil there; that isn't enough. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 15:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * To be honest I'm not sure that we could fall in with a request to block a chool permanently, whoever made it; I'll ask. If it is possible, an e-mail from a teacher, with contact details for the school, would probably be the minimum needed. --Mel Etitis  ( Talk ) 08:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, what's up with all the permablock requests on school IPs? Have you actually attended or worked at these schools, were you just randomly putting those on school IPs, or is it something else? PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 20:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Attacks in
Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 19:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Dag, mighty impressive speed with those replies. But anyway, despite the comment in the other dialogue, my account has not been compromised. The IPs that I 'attacked' belonged (Past tense because we're all home for Christmas now, and now they're idle IPS) to myself and to my roommates. I was testing the comment system, and decided to have a little fun with the contents of the messages. I didn't figure that anybody would ever actually look at those messages, let alone interpret them as 'attacks'. On that note, mind unbanning me, please? elnerdo (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * ✅ —  Aitias  // discussion 19:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about all of that. Just seemed unusual for an idle account in good standing to have come back in such an unusual manner. The activity somewhat resembled that of a silly account hacker that hacked User:RickK. PCHS-NJROTC  (Messages) 19:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * However, please remember not to do such disruptive edits in the future. :) —  Aitias  // discussion 19:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

ANI warning
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.