User talk:Eloquence

'''I will respond to messages on this page. Please check your contributions list ("My contributions") for responses. If there is a response, your edit is no longer the "top" edit in the list.'''

Unlike other Wikipedians I don't archive Talk pages since old revisions are automatically archived anyway - if you want to access previous comments, please use the "Page history" function. But I keep a log of the removals:


 * Removed all comments prior to Jan 2003. --Eloquence 04:42 Jan 1, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments prior to Feb 2003. --Eloquence 10:19 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments prior to March 2003. --Eloquence 21:19 Mar 3, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments prior to April 2003. --Eloquence 08:14 25 May 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to May 31 2003. -Eloquence 19:14 31 May 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to June 21, 2003. --Eloquence 18:58 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to July 3, 2003. --Eloquence 21:51 3 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to July 22, 2003. --Eloquence 09:07 24 Jul 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to August 28, 2003.&mdash;Eloquence 02:11, Aug 28, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to October 15, 2003.&mdash;Eloquence 22:39, Oct 15, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to December 5, 2003.&mdash;Eloquence 15:17, Dec 5, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to December 20, 2003.&mdash;Eloquence 12:42, Dec 20, 2003 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to February 23, 2004.&mdash;Eloquence 23:57, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to April 2, 2004.--Eloquence* 09:12, Apr 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to June 3, 2004.--Eloquence* 12:07, Jun 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to December 24, 2004.--Eloquence* 11:25, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to June 15, 2005.--Eloquence* 05:39, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to December 8, 2005.--Eloquence* 22:30, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to July 5, 2006.--Eloquence* 23:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to July 5, 2009.--Eloquence* 07:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to September 19, 2011.--Eloquence* 05:35, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Removed all comments up to March 11, 2016.--Eloquence* 23:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Prese moderato Eloquence
Hell I am ID:Naoki. I have license " Creatve Commons4.0"and etc. I Im work yesterday. I need moderato. Tank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ナカネコ (talk • contribs) 02:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

ID : Naoki
Pleses I am bloking naw plases unlock. Tnank you. ID:Naoki --ナカネコ (talk) 02:48, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

.

A page you started (FindFace) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating FindFace, Eloquence!

Wikipedia editor Dstone66 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This was an interesting creation, thank you."

To reply, leave a comment on Dstone66's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.


 * Thank you for the review and the categories, Dstone66! :) --Eloquence* 16:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

lib.reviews
Would this site be notable for Wikipedia yet? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * No, absolutely not. :-) --Eloquence* 19:33, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the prompt response. Figured as much. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

File:PDC 0062.JPG
A very long shot, but did you hang onto the permission e-mail?

Not going to use the template I would normally here, as you are senior enough to be trusted without question on such things :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:48, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I'll look in my archives and let you know later today.--Eloquence*


 * I was able to reconstruct the sequence of events that led to that photo being uploaded:


 * The photographer posted a long comment about the facility here on en.wp including the comment that the photos are "available for the asking".
 * I replied to that comment on-wiki (see above) and offered to upload the photos on his behalf.
 * He emailed me a bunch of photos, and I picked one of them to upload. There was no licensing statement in the email.


 * I'm not sure if that would pass muster today, though I would argue that the result clearly reflects his intent. I've tried emailing him to be sure, but unfortunately the original address is no longer working, and a Google search suggests that he may have died years ago.--Eloquence* 22:55, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest leaving the above on the file description page, but thanks :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Done!--Eloquence* 23:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Aww, thank you, MelanieN! Lots more being reported; glad you and others are improving the article & will take another look myself soon.--Eloquence* 23:05, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Lots of recent sources available; wish I could find some older, "pre-scandal" reporting for balance! but press coverage is what it is.
 * Do you mind if I nominate it for WP:DYK? --MelanieN (talk) 23:45, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Not at all! -- just a note that I won't be able to personally address any issues that come up in DYK review immediately.--Eloquence* 23:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Usually they would come after me as nominator. Hopefully they won't bother you. --MelanieN (talk) 00:12, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

FYI: It's been suggested at DYK that they hold off on it until after the November election. So don't hold your breath, it won't be on the main page for a couple of months but hopefully will get there eventually. Meanwhile, as new as this article is, it's getting hundreds of views a day. Clearly there was a need for it. --MelanieN (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Investigation
Template:Investigation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Request for openion
Article Legitimacy (criminal law) has been requested to be moved to Legitimacy (law) requesting your openion at Talk:Legitimacy_(criminal_law)

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the kind words, Gerda! :) --Eloquence* 07:27, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1942 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:18, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of dragons in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of dragons in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of dragons in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 10:09, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Merger discussion for DMZ_(computing)
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;DMZ_(computing)&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 19:37, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Windows listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows. Since you had some involvement with the Windows redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:05, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cat main
Template:Cat main has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. &#123;&#123;3x&#124;p&#125;&#125;ery (talk) 15:49, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

حذف Emanalhelale (talk) 17:52, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Urhixidur (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Good luck
 豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune. このミラPはEloquenceたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP 04:38, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Irateloc.png


The file File:Irateloc.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, dated information"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:New features" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:New features. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DemonDays64 (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

This aged well
ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ProcrastinatingReader: LOL, I know. And yet, in spite of its enduring popularity, I still think of Bitcoin as mainly a speculative asset.--Eloquence* 16:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Agree. It's unsustainable as a currency, from transaction fees to energy consumption if not adoption (considering most popular fiat exchanges have either hard limits or strong KYC requirements; Coinbase now asks for more than my bank!) As you say, though, its in the interest of investors to maintain the facade. It does surprise me how accurate your thoughts from 2011 turned out; the only one that hasn't materialised yet is Satoshi cashing out (and the nail in the coffin). ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Jeez, it’s getting worse. NFTs? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 03:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * ProcrastinatingReader: Indeed. It's telling that corporate media can brim over with excitement about new ways to monetize art and culture, but still have not begun even remotely to grapple with the potential of free culture that Wikipedia itself demonstrates.--Eloquence* 23:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Template shortcut
Template:Template shortcut has been nominated for merging with Template:Shortcut. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:AfD doc
Template:AfD doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 23:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mediawiki-gallery.png


The file File:Mediawiki-gallery.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused Wikimedia screenshot. Out of scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Would you be willing to interview?
I'm working on a project about Klingon Wikipedia, and I'd love to get your up-to-date thoughts on that project. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 22:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Windows listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows. Since you had some involvement with the Windows redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.96.18.106.49 (talk) 01:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Safari (web browser)
Safari (web browser) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sohom (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Big Fish
Big Fish has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Viriditas (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2024 (UTC)