User talk:Elthamboy

Welcome!

Hello, Elthamboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Racklever (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

William Burges
Minor to Burges, perhaps, but not to the noble lord. Many thanks for spotting this. KJP1 (talk) 13:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Hello, I'm DUCKISJAMMMY. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anthony Stokes‎ seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 12:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Anthony Stokes
Hello there, firstly when adding a new section on a users talk page please do so at the bottom. In regards to John Terry I don't know why you brought him up maybe because you seen the Chelsea userbox on my user page & as for Andy Goram I'm not familiar with him or his indiscretions so I won't comment. Additionally I never stated that footballers articles should only include career statistics as you said or a career section.

Now back to the issue in hand your edit stated The Scotmans felt (claimed) Stokes was a disgrace to Celtic. What a newspaper, journalist, you or myself feel about a player is irrelevant. General you should avoid making additions stating so-and-so thinks this, as they're usually unencyclopedic. If you wish to re-add something like In the later part of 2012 Stokes was strongly linked with criminal elements in Republic of Ireland or something to that effect I certainly wouldn't stop you especially seeing as the reference you provide says Celtic condemn his recent behaviour. But if you are going to re-add please use a full citation see here as bare urls go dead & personal life would be a more appropriate heading then off pitch. Regards &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Talk page new message position!
We generally create a new section at the bottom of the page, alternatively you can press Alt to create a new section at talk pages. That's all. If you have any question or comment you can post at my talk page clicking here. Best --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Martinevans123 (talk) 21:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570771476 your edit] to Bridgewater Four may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * a shot was fired over his head.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sammy backon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sammy backon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sammy backon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mccapra (talk) 00:11, 6 February 2023 (UTC)