User talk:Elttaruuu/2023/July

AfC notification: Draft:Gaylor (fan theory) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gaylor (fan theory). Thanks! Actualcpscm (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaylor (fan theory) has been accepted
 Gaylor (fan theory), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Gaylor_(fan_theory) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gaylor (fan theory)


A tag has been placed on Gaylor (fan theory) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Gaylors. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nythar (💬-🍀) 21:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Crystal Valentine
Hello, Elttaruuu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crystal Valentine, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Tommy Playboy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tommy Playboy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tommy Playboy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Worldiswide (talk) 02:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Afaq Mahmoud
Hello, Elttaruuu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Afaq Mahmoud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Liv Mammone
Hello, Elttaruuu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liv Mammone, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hi Elttaruuu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Frimatic–de Gribaldy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. As per Help_talk:Minor_edit/Archive_2 short descriptions are not minor edits. Paulpat99 (talk) 05:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Self published sources
Please see WP:RS and WP:RSP. Self published sources like YouTube and Substack as you recently used in Josephine Byrd are largely inappropriate for use in Wikipedia articles both from reliability and neutrality point of view. Articles should present things neutrally and not promote the subject or insert undue contents.

Instagram and Twitter for the most part are considered the same as Facebook posts. Please do not make edits like this sourced from social media. While Instagram, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube links are not absolutely banned, their usage is appropriate only in very limited situations. Graywalls (talk) 07:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Smoke Works Boston for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smoke Works Boston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Smoke Works Boston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Graywalls (talk) 11:39, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Article talk pages
Please do not blank article talk pages. Will you please restore all the comments you have removed? Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * My bad—I’ve seen a lot of people do this with none of them getting corrected. I thought it was a way of archiving clutter of resolved discussions. Is there a way to do this or should content be left on the talk page forever? Elttaruuu (talk) 19:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I see you also blanked what you left on my talk page. It's up to you if you want to blank your own page (this page) per WP:BLANKING but blanking article talk page or other user's talk page is a no no. Graywalls (talk) 21:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
 * If a talk page has gotten so long that it can’t easily be navigated, then it’s appropriate to set up an archive. But the article talk page must link to that archive and you should not preemptively archive comments that may still be relevant to other editors. You removed comments from pages with only very brief and/or still germane discussion. Please do not do that even if archiving correctly. Innisfree987 (talk) 00:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Please be more careful to check whether you’ve actually made the corrections. When I checked to be sure, I found five more pages where you reverted your most recent edit but did not actually restore the missing content. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:59, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging