User talk:Eluchil/junk

Final Fantasy userbox image
No, I think you misunderstand. I'm not arguing that Image:Moogle.png does not qualify for fair use. The issue is that, as a fair use image, it cannot be used outside of the article namespace. Which means that it cannot be included on templates or on user pages. The reasoning is that, to quote, "the material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." Since the stated purpose of Wikipedia is to provide an encyclopedia, we cannot rationalize using copyrighted images for non-encyclopedic purposes: all fair use rationales have to be framed in the context of how said material contributes to the goals of the site, and user pages do not contribute directly to those goals.

But that's just the rationale behind the guideline, and I apologize if I confused the issue by bringing it up. The long and short of it is that site guidelines expressly forbid us to use non-free images anywhere other than real articles, regardless of rationale. It's explicitly stated here (the second-to-last bullet point): "they should never be used on templates (including stub templates and navigation boxes) or on user pages." Sorry. – Seancdaug 04:16, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Belated thanks
I now have a few extra tabs at the top of my Wikipedia pages. Thanks for your support. Banno 08:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: DeGroot Original Research
Simple: If you review the requirements for "No Original Research" you'd see that it says, "Original research is a term used on Wikipedia to refer to material added to articles by Wikipedia editors that has not been published already by a reputable source. In this context it means unpublished theories, data, statements, concepts, arguments, and ideas; or any new interpretation, analysis, or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts, arguments that, in the words of Wikipedia's co-founder Jimbo Wales, would amount to a 'novel narrative or historical interpretation'." The section that was removed was, "One of the names mentioned in the orientation video in series 2 is de Groot. This name is shared by a 20th century chess master and psychologist Adriaan de Groot who did significant research in the area of memory. This could prove to be particularly relevant given that most episodes show past memories of the characters, and that the black smoke seems to read Mr. Eko's memory in The 23rd Psalm." This connection is a new idea that has never been brought up in any verifiable source; additionally, the statement, "This could prove to be..." indicates that what follows is pure speculation.—LeFlyman 00:59, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually, it isn't just "the only real issue is that there is no official source to confirm this outside of the facts presented"; it's that claiming a connection between the name of a fictional character, and someone else with a similar name, without having a verifiable source for that basis is speculative-- thus not encyclopedically valid. We are attempting to raise the status of the Lost articles to qualify for "featured" status, which means excluding such fancruft as name theories (of which we've excised quite a few). Please take a look at Reliable sources for info on what sources qualifies for inclusion. —LeFlyman 01:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Minor Question on the Cowboy Bebop Article
In the Brain Scratch episode, you say that "Ein is apparently also able to hack computers via a brain wave interface (demonstrated in episode 23, "Brain Scratch"), further indication of his abnormal capabilities.)

However, I was under the impression that they were using Ein simply to use Ein's heightened doggie senses for him to be able to stop/avoid the unconscious/subliminal hypnotization -- or at least the comic relief of them deeming him 'expendable'.

Was that statement of yours opinion, or did you find it in a reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubacxo (talk • contribs)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there!--DarkEvil 17:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Star
Thank you, I appreciate it!

(and in case you're interested in a Mop, I should point out that I'm one of the harder people to get nominated by... I've noticed you do good work regarding fantasy- and game-related articles, but if you want my advice you should mark edits as "minor" less frequently. I generally feel that admins or candidates should have experience with the maintenance side of Wikipedia, not just with editing. Of course, the community does not necessarily concur).  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  13:51, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Romantic Issues in Aerith Gainsborough
Thank you for the editing of "Zackness". I didn't want to seem too "biased" towards Clerith (in which I'm really sick of the LT and support neither), if I didn't edit it back. There needed to be more wikipedians supporting there, 'cause I was overruled by anonymous users insisting on inserting the quote showing the Zack and Cloud parallel. &mdash;Mirlen 04:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey there
I noticed you help maintain the Final Fantasy VII page. I moved some of the information seen into the lead section into their own sections to help reduce the introduction's size; figured you might want to take a look and see what else can be done. Thanks. Deckiller 21:01, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga
You are listed as a participant of WikiProject Anime and manga. A recent change in how participants are listed — using a category — will result in your inadvertent removal from the project. If you wish to continue your participantion, please check the the project page for details on how to add yourself back to the project. - Squilibob 01:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature. When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --Spook (my talk 11:54, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Z2linkimpazelda.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Z2linkimpazelda.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ReyBrujo 04:25, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Waves
I just wanted to say high. I did a double take when I saw your vote on RfA. I knew you existed (since my firs choice username was taken) but hadn't seen you around before. Is your name, like mine, based on this Eluchil? Eluchil404 15:23, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Young ruto.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Young ruto.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 23:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Mastersword.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mastersword.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thunderbrand 19:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Mastersword.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mastersword.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Dariuna.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dariuna.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Need sources for the following:
- A Link to the Past (talk) 19:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Cyberpunk
Cyberpunk has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Quadzilla99 23:23, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Child link zelda.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Child link zelda.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 02:09, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Child link zelda.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Child link zelda.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 01:19, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Young with fairy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Young with fairy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 01:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Z2linkimpazelda.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Z2linkimpazelda.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 07:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:LinkLostWoods.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LinkLostWoods.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 11:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)