User talk:ElvisBeatles1957

December 2014
Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Witchy Woman, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:35, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Loving You (album), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Punish Her‎, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. LongLiveMusic (talk) 01:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Buddy Holly (album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 17:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Good Times (Elvis Presley album). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Stop editing the genre articles without sources Dpm12 15:26 5 January 2015

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Sulfur (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for genre-warring despite repeated warnings to stop and an apparent refusal to communicate with others when your edits are challenged. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:55, 27 January 2015 (UTC)