User talk:ElvisPresley1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! &mdash; e. ripley\talk 20:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of This City Is Ours (Big Time Rush)
A tag has been placed on This City Is Ours (Big Time Rush) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 20:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, ElvisPresley1, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Unless you are Elvis Presley, this is a misleading name.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. I42 (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ignore this; I am told the name is fine, because you are not impersonating a living person. I42 (talk) 18:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Michael Jackson.jr"
A page you created, Michael Jackson.jr, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jusdafax  18:07, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matt Riedy
A tag has been placed on Matt Riedy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xtzou ( Talk ) 18:23, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abraham Einstein


The article Abraham Einstein has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Copyover from Hermann Einstein. Not about the article subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 23:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2014 in home video


The article 2014 in home video has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:CRYSTAL.The only film on the list is Avatar 2 which is only announced so it's not a for sure thing that no production trouble will happen.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Logan Talk Contributions 20:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gregorian calendar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Beautyshop Music
I have nominated Beautyshop Music, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Beautyshop Music. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Schuhpuppe (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.keepingpace.org/content.aspx?page_id=22&club_id=856350&module_id=54778. As a copyright violation, Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Keeping Pace with Multiple Miracles.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Erpert (let's talk about it) 15:37, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Please note that even if the copyright issue were resolved, the promotional tone of a company or personal website is likely to be unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." There is more detail at Notability (organizations and companies), and good advice on how to write an acceptable article at Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to United States Presidential Election, 2012 has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Wikipedia has a policy called Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, which discourages such edits. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reference to a reliable source. Thank you. GorillaWarfare talk 15:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States presidential election, 2012, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:27, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. The next time you make a personal attack&#32;as you did at User talk:Erpert, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Keeping Pace with Multaple Miracles
A tag has been placed on Keeping Pace with Multaple Miracles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for your continued personal attacks and harassment against User:Erpert as in this edit. Canterbury Tail  talk  21:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Derild 49  21  ☼  20:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Diary Of A Wimpy Kid: The Worst Summer Ever, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Derild 49  21  ☼  13:52, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Avatar 2 (2014 Film) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avatar 2 (2014 Film). Since you had some involvement with the Avatar 2 (2014 Film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt Riedy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Riedy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matt Riedy& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ploni (talk) 21:52, 19 May 2022 (UTC)