User talk:Elvisdave

January 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kaycee Records has been reverted. Your edit here to Kaycee Records was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/KayceeRecords/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cyril Ogwu for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyril Ogwu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cyril Ogwu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 12:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox recordlabel
Template:Infobox recordlabel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —teb728 t c 01:45, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Blacksnipe Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blacksnipe Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blacksnipe Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Blacksnipe Entertainment (Music Label) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blacksnipe Entertainment (Music Label) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Blacksnipe Entertainment (Music Label) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 10:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this recent edit to Blacksnipe Entertainment (Music Label), you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Dat GuyTalkContribs 16:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)